Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 12 Nov 2002 11:32:26 -0800
From:      Rich Morin <rdm@cfcl.com>
To:        freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Shrinking /(s)bin: A Proposal
Message-ID:  <p05200f03b9f706009d91@[192.168.254.205]>
In-Reply-To: <3DD03D9A.6090805@acm.org>
References:  <3DD03D9A.6090805@acm.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
My spouse had the problem of creating a bootable copy of A/UX on a
single floppy.  She decided to write a "doitall" program that had
functionality from a number of small commands.  This amortized the
overhead a great deal.

A similar approach could be used for /(s)bin: lump several programs
together into a single binary, but give the binary links for each
of the original names (and have the program respond according to
the name used, ala vi/ex).

My general reaction, however, is that this issue (shrinking sbin)
is not worth trashing the software engineering of piles of commands.

-r
-- 
email: rdm@cfcl.com; phone: +1 650-873-7841
http://www.cfcl.com/rdm    - my home page, resume, etc.
http://www.cfcl.com/Meta   - The FreeBSD Browser, Meta Project, etc.
http://www.ptf.com/dossier - Prime Time Freeware's DOSSIER series
http://www.ptf.com/tdc     - Prime Time Freeware's Darwin Collection

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?p05200f03b9f706009d91>