From owner-freebsd-hackers Sat Mar 25 11:33:20 1995 Return-Path: hackers-owner Received: (from majordom@localhost) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) id LAA00996 for hackers-outgoing; Sat, 25 Mar 1995 11:33:20 -0800 Received: from trout.sri.MT.net (trout.sri.MT.net [204.182.243.12]) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) with ESMTP id LAA00990 for ; Sat, 25 Mar 1995 11:33:15 -0800 Received: (from nate@localhost) by trout.sri.MT.net (8.6.9/8.6.9) id MAA14246; Sat, 25 Mar 1995 12:37:13 -0700 Date: Sat, 25 Mar 1995 12:37:13 -0700 From: Nate Williams Message-Id: <199503251937.MAA14246@trout.sri.MT.net> In-Reply-To: Amancio Hasty "Re: httpd as part of the system." (Mar 24, 11:10pm) X-Mailer: Mail User's Shell (7.2.5 10/14/92) To: Amancio Hasty Subject: Re: httpd as part of the system. Cc: hackers@freefall.cdrom.com Sender: hackers-owner@FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk > > > > I would like to propose that we add the following two components to our > > > > system in an effort to both: > > ... > > > 3. exmh (a tcl/tk wrapper for mh it also understands MIME) > > > > Why would we add a tool to mh as part of the standard system when mh is > > NOT part of the standard system? It seems kind of foolish to me. > > I really feel that in order to have an Internet Out Of The Box type > system we do need a grahical interface to mail. This is 1995 and > not a throw back to the early 70's. Then we better not provide MH as the mailer since it is non-trivial to use. Something like PINE would be the mailer to use, but it doesn't provide a GUI yet. > >(And NO, we're not going to add specific mailers to the distribution. It's > > Hashed out by whom ?? The entire -hackers list. Nate