From owner-freebsd-arch Fri Nov 8 5:34: 7 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C98437B404 for ; Fri, 8 Nov 2002 05:34:06 -0800 (PST) Received: from fledge.watson.org (fledge.watson.org [204.156.12.50]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4685743E9E for ; Fri, 8 Nov 2002 05:34:04 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from robert@fledge.watson.org) Received: from fledge.watson.org (fledge.pr.watson.org [192.0.2.3]) by fledge.watson.org (8.12.4/8.12.4) with SMTP id gA8DXJOo062010; Fri, 8 Nov 2002 08:33:25 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from robert@fledge.watson.org) Date: Fri, 8 Nov 2002 08:33:18 -0500 (EST) From: Robert Watson X-Sender: robert@fledge.watson.org To: Cyrille Lefevre Cc: arch@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Status of lukemftpd? (was: cvs commit: src/etc inetd.conf (fwd)) In-Reply-To: <20021105204013.GC56253@gits.dyndns.org> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Tue, 5 Nov 2002, Cyrille Lefevre wrote: > On Sun, Oct 27, 2002 at 12:33:41AM -0400, Robert Watson wrote: > > > > On Sat, 26 Oct 2002, David O'Brien wrote: > > > > > > (1) All references to lukemftpd as "the ftpd" be corrected to indicate > > > > lukemftpd is not the default. Most of these are leaked references > > > > from lukemftpd man pages that were not updated in the import. > > > > > > We typically don't rewrite contrib'ed vendor branch code. On some of my > > > systems lukemftp is THE ftpd, so they do apply. > > > > Just to make it completely clear what I'm talking about here: we do have a > > "the ftpd", because we install it as /usr/libexec/ftpd. Lukemftpd is > > installed as /usr/libexec/lukemftpd. Documentation should refer to the > > binaries and man pages correctly. One specific example of this is > > ftpd.conf(5), which incorrectly stats: > > how about the following PR ? > > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=bin/39676 This PR looks like it would pretty cleanly address the first set of problems I identified regarding the man pages being inaccurate. Robert N M Watson FreeBSD Core Team, TrustedBSD Projects robert@fledge.watson.org Network Associates Laboratories To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message