From owner-svn-src-head@freebsd.org Thu Mar 5 05:27:21 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-src-head@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F2C6F25D532; Thu, 5 Mar 2020 05:27:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from asomers@gmail.com) Received: from mail-oi1-f181.google.com (mail-oi1-f181.google.com [209.85.167.181]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "GTS CA 1O1" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 48XzlW5fcmz41yZ; Thu, 5 Mar 2020 05:27:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from asomers@gmail.com) Received: by mail-oi1-f181.google.com with SMTP id g6so4753393oiy.1; Wed, 04 Mar 2020 21:27:19 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=cIWcTTCwsrGBXgoCxygzKbDWSySCEqGqvDGIo04qgCY=; b=jDWLjtI+zai3HfjI8Z3fHCUZ5xDrgFCOHpQf2aHCfZ0ZDjFqFkry8RcapoSdC9w3Za oXNnbK1rmXh8/HiE4icJhXJDbLDISpM/bHaE5KwcIMHxyKvsoqZ7WUZyoq2TPudLs75E DfE0sFkVXXDkiWNDdtDKqmfj5z3CH+LbvtDc07LybyUdzrOQxKl4pRnOytEOSpXTU+Ge OO25XxgzktnwsAnfv2JO3mCPFjboZvIC1FvLi+neX2VHsZsXg/FLjG20vucgJegnHRoe Ny/jJMs6fLZbsV8GkSamEbPZfUMC0DddaJFd2mZdSX5f+RS/t8thzvqeHIv8j+SGqEFc 6ZAg== X-Gm-Message-State: ANhLgQ0xP2oLsUo6Dstk23wuYBBjmKe8XIqlSApuMrjn3X1SJ2fDhUCX ZFxwzXWBZKuTYR+S28UbGYpgrsE0dGjMTvW0wKT9vjGp X-Google-Smtp-Source: ADFU+vuqJHBhNWwAPylfnMDX2lrJNFS1xOSYhyFPxfEkH4W8rfLEQUJCSKjV201yCYxygKFG+hKvQ0ypLZ24acCeyPc= X-Received: by 2002:aca:c256:: with SMTP id s83mr4524912oif.57.1583386037288; Wed, 04 Mar 2020 21:27:17 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <201904071839.x37IduPO002007@repo.freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <201904071839.x37IduPO002007@repo.freebsd.org> From: Alan Somers Date: Wed, 4 Mar 2020 22:27:06 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: svn commit: r346018 - head/sys/conf To: Warner Losh Cc: src-committers , svn-src-all , svn-src-head X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 48XzlW5fcmz41yZ X-Spamd-Bar: --- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of asomers@gmail.com designates 209.85.167.181 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=asomers@gmail.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-3.04 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[4]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip4:209.85.128.0/17:c]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[multipart/alternative,text/plain]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[freebsd.org]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; IP_SCORE(-1.04)[ip: (-0.51), ipnet: 209.85.128.0/17(-2.98), asn: 15169(-1.66), country: US(-0.05)]; TO_DN_ALL(0.00)[]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[181.167.85.209.list.dnswl.org : 127.0.5.0]; FORGED_SENDER(0.30)[asomers@freebsd.org,asomers@gmail.com]; RWL_MAILSPIKE_POSSIBLE(0.00)[181.167.85.209.rep.mailspike.net : 127.0.0.17]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+,1:+,2:~]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; FREEMAIL_ENVFROM(0.00)[gmail.com]; ASN(0.00)[asn:15169, ipnet:209.85.128.0/17, country:US]; FROM_NEQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[asomers@freebsd.org,asomers@gmail.com]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.29 X-BeenThere: svn-src-head@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: SVN commit messages for the src tree for head/-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 05 Mar 2020 05:27:22 -0000 On Sun, Apr 7, 2019 at 12:40 PM Warner Losh wrote: > Author: imp > Date: Sun Apr 7 18:39:55 2019 > New Revision: 346018 > URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/346018 > > Log: > Use default shell assignment rather more complicated if then > construct. > > Discussed with: emaste@, allanjude@ (changes (or not) based on their > feedback) > Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D19797 > Can we MFC this to stable/12? Before this change, setting BRANCH_OVERRIDE during "make release" would have no effect.