From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Wed May 28 19:57:44 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 246B037B401 for ; Wed, 28 May 2003 19:57:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: from remt23.cluster1.charter.net (remt23.cluster1.charter.net [209.225.8.33]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1881A43FB1 for ; Wed, 28 May 2003 19:57:43 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from glennpj@charter.net) Received: from [24.158.214.251] (HELO gforce.johnson.home) by remt23.cluster1.charter.net (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.0.6) with ESMTP id 43316132; Wed, 28 May 2003 22:57:41 -0400 Received: from gforce.johnson.home (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by gforce.johnson.home (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id h4T2va9j009509; Wed, 28 May 2003 21:57:36 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from glenn@gforce.johnson.home) Received: (from glenn@localhost) by gforce.johnson.home (8.12.9/8.12.9/Submit) id h4T2vahQ009488; Wed, 28 May 2003 21:57:36 -0500 (CDT) From: Glenn Johnson Date: Wed, 28 May 2003 21:57:35 -0500 To: Mike Makonnen Message-ID: <20030529025735.GA2882@gforce.johnson.home> Mail-Followup-To: Mike Makonnen , freebsd-current@freebsd.org References: <20030526225111.HVVN25800.out006.verizon.net@kokeb.ambesa.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20030526225111.HVVN25800.out006.verizon.net@kokeb.ambesa.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Libthr stable enough for testing X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 May 2003 02:57:44 -0000 On Mon, May 26, 2003 at 06:51:10PM -0400, Mike Makonnen wrote: > Hello folks, > > Most major locking work in libthr is finished. I believe it is stable > enough now that it can be used for most applications[1]. I would > appreciate it if people would try it out and report any bugs. > > [1] - I haven't had a chance to test it on an SMP machine. The machine I was > going to use crashed for unrelated reasons, but it should be > back up soon. Never the less I would be interested to hear > from people who have "real world" threaded applications on SMP > systems. It seems to be working fine on a UP machine but it locks up my SMP machine just trying to load a gnome session. It leaves an image on the screen but the keyboard and mouse stop responding and I can not ssh into the box. -- Glenn Johnson glennpj@charter.net