From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Apr 30 10:56:36 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2AEC816A4CE for ; Fri, 30 Apr 2004 10:56:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: from avalon.linuxpowered.com (avalon.linuxpowered.com [64.246.60.115]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE65B43D7F for ; Fri, 30 Apr 2004 10:56:35 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from diz@linuxpowered.com) Received: from linuxpowered.com (txirvcom-itnfw01.verizon.com [::ffff:192.76.54.20]) (AUTH: CRAM-MD5 diz@linuxpowered.com) by avalon.linuxpowered.com with esmtp; Fri, 30 Apr 2004 13:07:01 -0500 Message-ID: <40929332.5080704@linuxpowered.com> Date: Fri, 30 Apr 2004 12:56:02 -0500 From: masta Organization: wifibsd.org User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.6) Gecko/20040113 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Eivind Olsen References: <340419687.1083326256@[10.122.7.143]> In-Reply-To: <340419687.1083326256@[10.122.7.143]> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: IPSEC, IPv6, RELENG_5_2 X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: masta@wifibsd.org List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 30 Apr 2004 17:56:36 -0000 Howdy, FAST_IPSEC and hi/fn hardware acceleration are mutually exclusive. Try without FAST_IPSEC. -Jon Eivind Olsen wrote: > Hello. > Does anyone know of a way to make hardware accelerated (Soekris > vpn1401 card) VPN work on a RELENG_5_2 box (or CURRENT, if need be..) > and at the same time support IPv6? > > I believe I need FAST_IPSEC to get hardware accelerated VPN/IPSEC, and > it doesn't look like I can compile in both FAST_IPSEC and INET6 at the > same time in the kernel. > I have read that FAST_IPSEC doesn't do IPSEC for IPv6 and that's OK > with me, but I'd still like to be able to use IPv6 for some > connections and IPSEC for a VPN-connection (running over IPv4). > > Anyone who knows if this is somehow possible? >