From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 29 23:00:54 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E9E5A16A4CE for ; Wed, 29 Sep 2004 23:00:54 +0000 (GMT) Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org (CPE0050040655c8-CM00111ae02aac.cpe.net.cable.rogers.com [69.194.102.143]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C055B43D45 for ; Wed, 29 Sep 2004 23:00:54 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id BC41D5144B; Wed, 29 Sep 2004 16:01:18 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2004 16:01:18 -0700 From: Kris Kennaway To: TM4525@aol.com Message-ID: <20040929230118.GA43201@xor.obsecurity.org> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="mYCpIKhGyMATD0i+" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Freebsd 5.2.1 Performance Woes X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2004 23:00:55 -0000 --mYCpIKhGyMATD0i+ Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Sep 29, 2004 at 05:51:53PM -0400, TM4525@aol.com wrote: > While I was had a nice little test set up, I figured I'd test Freebsd 4.9= =20 > against 5.2.1 since I had fresh installs handy on separate drives. > The simple test was as follows: >=20 > Hardware: >=20 > Celeron 2.4Ghz processor > Dual onboard Intel (em) NICs, 32bit, 33Mhz bus >=20 > Setup: >=20 > Traffic Generator -> FreeBSD System -> Server >=20 > I had it set up to route between the 2 interfaces (ie NOT bridged). I > fired a unidirectional stream of UDP packets (so there was no return traf= fic > from the server, which was discarding the packets) at a rate of ~100Kpps.= =20 > The disturbing results: >=20 > FreeBSD 4.9: 33% interrupt usage > FreeBSD 5.2.1: >80% interrupt usage >=20 > What has happened to the stack?=20 See the Early Adopter's Guide that was distributed with 5.2.1, or just don't worry about it and update to 5.3 which has vastly better network performance. Kris --mYCpIKhGyMATD0i+ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFBWz6+Wry0BWjoQKURAmf/AJ9LvY0r7TiXCUWhl8PoQGLd2TH9HQCfZ9T+ +fTQv+EVLDmVQtqOqTTha5w= =Sa8H -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --mYCpIKhGyMATD0i+--