From owner-freebsd-hackers  Mon Feb  3 06:08:10 1997
Return-Path: <owner-hackers>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id GAA29715
          for hackers-outgoing; Mon, 3 Feb 1997 06:08:10 -0800 (PST)
Received: from terra.Sarnoff.COM (terra.sarnoff.com [130.33.11.203])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id GAA29708
          for <hackers@freefall.freebsd.org>; Mon, 3 Feb 1997 06:08:06 -0800 (PST)
Received: (from rminnich@localhost) by terra.Sarnoff.COM (8.6.12/8.6.12) id JAA03379; Mon, 3 Feb 1997 09:06:08 -0500
Date: Mon, 3 Feb 1997 09:06:07 -0500 (EST)
From: "Ron G. Minnich" <rminnich@Sarnoff.COM>
X-Sender: rminnich@terra
To: Narvi <narvi@haldjas.folklore.ee>
cc: Terry Lambert <terry@lambert.org>, gurney_j@resnet.uoregon.edu,
        hackers@freefall.freebsd.org
Subject: Re: performance puzzler
In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.3.95.970202201858.13473A-100000@haldjas.folklore.ee>
Message-ID: <Pine.SUN.3.91.970203090455.3325C-100000@terra>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

On Sun, 2 Feb 1997, Narvi wrote:
> On Sat, 1 Feb 1997, Terry Lambert wrote:
> > The PCI and EISA standards specify 33MHz as their top end.
> Where did I read about 66Mhz revision/mode for PCI? Was it in a dream or
> just a "not supported by anybody yet" possibility as is the 64bit card
> width. Or was it all just a dream or erroneus news article?

chapter 7 of the pci rev 2.1 spec discusses the 66 mhz. spec. Also 64 
bits has been in forever. 

ron