From owner-freebsd-mobile@FreeBSD.ORG  Wed Apr 14 07:56:15 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-mobile@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-mobile@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B54A16A4CE
	for <freebsd-mobile@freebsd.org>;
	Wed, 14 Apr 2004 07:56:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp.web.de (smtp06.web.de [217.72.192.224])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA5D443D1F
	for <freebsd-mobile@freebsd.org>;
	Wed, 14 Apr 2004 07:56:14 -0700 (PDT)	(envelope-from nakal@web.de)
Received: from [217.225.228.178] (helo=[217.225.228.178])
	by smtp.web.de with esmtp (TLSv1:DES-CBC3-SHA:168)
	(WEB.DE 4.101 #91)
	id 1BDloB-0001Ak-00; Wed, 14 Apr 2004 16:56:11 +0200
From: Martin <nakal@web.de>
To: Dan Langille <dan@langille.org>
In-Reply-To: <20040414035632.B1308@toxic.magnesium.net>
References: <1081867789.772.10.camel@klotz.local>
	<1081882028.772.29.camel@klotz.local>
	<20040414035632.B1308@toxic.magnesium.net>
Content-Type: text/plain
Message-Id: <1081954568.1036.10.camel@klotz.local>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.6 
Date: Wed, 14 Apr 2004 16:56:08 +0200
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: nakal@web.de
cc: freebsd-mobile@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Wireless auth mode "shared" is missing on FreeBSD
X-BeenThere: freebsd-mobile@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Mobile computing with FreeBSD <freebsd-mobile.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-mobile>,
	<mailto:freebsd-mobile-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-mobile>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-mobile@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-mobile-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-mobile>,
	<mailto:freebsd-mobile-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Apr 2004 14:56:15 -0000

On Wed, 2004-04-14 at 12:57, Dan Langille wrote:

> > /me unplugs his WAP
> 
> FWIW, I plan to put my WAP on another subnet and require IPsec.

That's a good idea.

Does anyone know a case where 104 bit WEP keys have been cracked?

Martin