From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 22 02:31:34 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5CBDB16A4CE for ; Wed, 22 Dec 2004 02:31:34 +0000 (GMT) Received: from pi.codefab.com (pi.codefab.com [199.103.21.227]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0005543D53 for ; Wed, 22 Dec 2004 02:31:33 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from cswiger@mac.com) Received: from [192.168.1.3] (pool-68-160-208-232.ny325.east.verizon.net [68.160.208.232]) by pi.codefab.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id iBM2VR8H066533 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 21 Dec 2004 21:31:28 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <41C8DC87.5080207@mac.com> Date: Tue, 21 Dec 2004 21:31:35 -0500 From: Chuck Swiger Organization: The Courts of Chaos User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.7.3) Gecko/20040910 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: John Conover References: <20041221104508.1002.qmail@rahul.net> In-Reply-To: <20041221104508.1002.qmail@rahul.net> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.89.5.0 X-Enigmail-Supports: pgp-inline, pgp-mime Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.8 required=5.5 tests=RCVD_IN_NJABL_DUL, RCVD_IN_SORBS_DUL autolearn=disabled version=3.0.1 X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.1 (2004-10-22) on pi.codefab.com cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: UFS2 with Soft Updates Robust? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 22 Dec 2004 02:31:34 -0000 John Conover wrote: > Is UFS2 with soft updates the most robust file system in freebsd? No, although UFS2 with softupdates is robust enough for production use. If you make the filesystem writes syncronous and disable write caching on the hard drive, you will improve the robustness at significant cost to performance. -- -Chuck