From owner-freebsd-stable Sun Oct 1 19: 2:10 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from jade.chc-chimes.com (jade.chc-chimes.com [216.28.46.6]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B3B5D37B503 for ; Sun, 1 Oct 2000 19:02:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: by jade.chc-chimes.com (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 3C3FD1C64; Sun, 1 Oct 2000 22:02:04 -0400 (EDT) Date: Sun, 1 Oct 2000 22:02:04 -0400 From: Bill Fumerola To: BSD Cc: "Jeffrey J. Mountin" , stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Another 4.1-S panic (full report) Message-ID: <20001001220204.E38472@jade.chc-chimes.com> References: <20001001154131.Y38472@jade.chc-chimes.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 1.0i In-Reply-To: ; from bsd@shell-server.com on Sun, Oct 01, 2000 at 08:59:13PM -0500 X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 3.3-STABLE i386 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Sun, Oct 01, 2000 at 08:59:13PM -0500, BSD wrote: > On Sun, 1 Oct 2000, Bill Fumerola wrote: > > > > >cpu I686_CPU # aka Pentium Pro(tm) > > > > >options NO_F00F_HACK > > > > > > > > The F00F problem is only with Pentiums. > > > Exactly why I disable the work-around code with NO_F00F_HACK > > > option :) > > That's like saying "I turn down the scsi probe time" without having any > > scsi devices in your kernel. Every time NO_F00F_HACK is used is in conjunction > > with I586_CPU. > > But...the CPU is i686. Go reread this thread a few more times and then realize that's my point. -- Bill Fumerola - Network Architect, BOFH / Chimes, Inc. billf@chimesnet.com / billf@FreeBSD.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message