Date: Mon, 16 Nov 2009 18:20:11 +0100 From: Torfinn Ingolfsen <tingox@gmail.com> To: FreeBSD Ports ML <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org> Cc: Bernhard Froehlich <decke@bluelife.at>, multimedia@freebsd.org Subject: Re: p5-xmltv - old? Message-ID: <ef8c8a880911160920v229c53bcwa5728b547a512b0f@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <f94ed96d0e270a0bf2c5a4a0a25977bf.squirrel@webmail.itac.at> References: <ef8c8a880911141524t4d1939cye6b2635ec4df82ca@mail.gmail.com> <8918c1a2037dab2e41e092833e042f39.squirrel@webmail.itac.at> <ef8c8a880911150927i65ed7b99yc5ac9d7fd5b5b187@mail.gmail.com> <f94ed96d0e270a0bf2c5a4a0a25977bf.squirrel@webmail.itac.at>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi, On Sun, Nov 15, 2009 at 8:10 PM, Bernhard Froehlich <decke@bluelife.at>wrote: > Builds fine in my 7-stable/i386 tinderbox. I've checked which ports are > depending on p5-xmltv [1] and checked if that update could affect them. > > deskutils/ontv: NOTOK using tv_grab_be > misc/freeguide: OK using tv_cat > multimedia/freevo: OK using tv_cat > multimedia/mythtv: OK using tv_check > multimedia/tv_grab_au: OK using tv_check > > The only one that definitely needs fixing is ontv. The others look good. > And that one (ontv) has gnome@ as the maintainer. How should this be handled; should I send a mail to the gnome list first, before sending in the PR? Or should I just send the PR and then send a mail telling them that the ontv port will / might be affected? -- Regards, Torfinn Ingolfsen
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?ef8c8a880911160920v229c53bcwa5728b547a512b0f>