From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jul 2 21:58:32 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E92B6106564A for ; Fri, 2 Jul 2010 21:58:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jmc-freebsd2@milibyte.co.uk) Received: from relay.ptn-ipout01.plus.net (relay.ptn-ipout01.plus.net [212.159.7.35]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 855388FC0A for ; Fri, 2 Jul 2010 21:58:32 +0000 (UTC) X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AmgFAIv9LUxUXebj/2dsb2JhbACTM4wycb9nhSQE Received: from outmx01.plus.net ([84.93.230.227]) by relay.ptn-ipout01.plus.net with ESMTP; 02 Jul 2010 22:58:31 +0100 Received: from helix.plus.com ([84.92.153.232] helo=curlew.milibyte.co.uk) by outmx01.plus.net with esmtp (Exim) id 1OUoFi-0003Ph-KY for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Fri, 02 Jul 2010 22:58:30 +0100 Received: by curlew.milibyte.co.uk with local (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1OUoFi-0004HY-1R for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Fri, 02 Jul 2010 22:58:30 +0100 From: Mike Clarke To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Fri, 2 Jul 2010 22:58:29 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.10 References: In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <201007022258.29863.jmc-freebsd2@milibyte.co.uk> X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: jmc-freebsd2@milibyte.co.uk X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on curlew.milibyte.co.uk); SAEximRunCond expanded to false Subject: Re: Staying up to date with security patches X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 02 Jul 2010 21:58:33 -0000 On Friday 02 July 2010, Ed Flecko wrote: > Since I will be doing a custom kernel at some point, I won't use > freebsd-update, I'm using cvsup instead. The alternative would be to just use the source code patches from the security-advisories mailing list. That way you don't have to rebuild the whole base system each time, though some of the patches will require the kernel to be rebuilt. -- Mike Clarke