From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 20 18:56:51 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F65416A41F for ; Tue, 20 Sep 2005 18:56:51 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: from mail21.sea5.speakeasy.net (mail21.sea5.speakeasy.net [69.17.117.23]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1C73843D46 for ; Tue, 20 Sep 2005 18:56:50 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: (qmail 3362 invoked from network); 20 Sep 2005 18:56:49 -0000 Received: from dsl092-078-145.bos1.dsl.speakeasy.net (HELO be-well.ilk.org) ([66.92.78.145]) (envelope-sender ) by mail21.sea5.speakeasy.net (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 20 Sep 2005 18:56:49 -0000 Received: by be-well.ilk.org (Postfix, from userid 1147) id B538340; Tue, 20 Sep 2005 14:56:48 -0400 (EDT) Sender: lowell@be-well.ilk.org To: dick hoogendijk To: questions@freebsd.org References: <20050920201411.2914a331.dick@nagual.st> From: Lowell Gilbert Date: 20 Sep 2005 14:56:48 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20050920201411.2914a331.dick@nagual.st> Message-ID: <44u0gfsh3j.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> Lines: 18 User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Subject: Re: Xprt X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: questions@freebsd.org List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 20 Sep 2005 18:56:51 -0000 dick hoogendijk writes: > Yesterday I upgraded my xorg-printserver. Afterwards my Xprt would not > start. Looking at /usr/X11R6/etc/rc.d/xprint.sh I did not have a > POSIX-shell. Hmmm.. seems you need ksh or bash for xprint all of > a sudden. A warning would have been nice. That script only requires a POSIX shell, and our standard /bin/sh should work fine. I just tried it, and it does work for me. > Another thing: why would I need Xprt ?? For example, to be able to treat a printer as an X output device. > Without it, my programs seem to print fine too. A lot of people don't need it. If you don't, feel fine about not using it.