From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jun 27 06:29:02 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D3A6537B405; Fri, 27 Jun 2003 06:29:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: from fledge.watson.org (fledge.watson.org [204.156.12.50]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 056244400D; Fri, 27 Jun 2003 06:28:58 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from robert@fledge.watson.org) Received: from fledge.watson.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by fledge.watson.org (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id h5RDSWKJ072473; Fri, 27 Jun 2003 09:28:32 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from robert@fledge.watson.org) Received: from localhost (robert@localhost)h5RDSWFE072470; Fri, 27 Jun 2003 09:28:32 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from robert@fledge.watson.org) Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2003 09:28:31 -0400 (EDT) From: Robert Watson X-Sender: robert@fledge.watson.org To: Ying-Chieh Liao In-Reply-To: <20030627052728.GA1015@terry.dragon2.net> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII cc: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org cc: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: something wrong with fxp driver ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2003 13:29:03 -0000 You might compare the dmesg output from before/after and see if there are any obvious changes in IRQ allocation, shared interrupts, etc. Perhaps the changes in interrupt routing have resulted in some new behavior. Robert N M Watson FreeBSD Core Team, TrustedBSD Projects robert@fledge.watson.org Network Associates Laboratories On Fri, 27 Jun 2003, Ying-Chieh Liao wrote: > my previous kernel is about May 10, and the fxp works fine for me > but I cvsuped and make world/kernel yesterday (6/26), and then terrible thing > happens... the connection becomes v...e...r...y... s...l...o...w... > my ping time to the gateway is about 8000ms (but sometimes 20ms) > > I've browse the mail archive of -current and -net, and I've noticed some > similar problems with fxp (device timeout), and I also get this message > (fxp0 device timeout) in my dmesg output, but I cant find out any solution :< > Is there any workaround, or patches ? > -- > char*p="char*p=%c%s%c;main(){printf(p,34,p,34);}";main(){printf(p,34,p,34);} > -- Anonymous >