Date: Sun, 1 Jul 2007 20:54:39 +0200 From: "Claus Guttesen" <kometen@gmail.com> To: "Wojciech Puchar" <wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> Cc: Nguyen Tam Chinh <unixvn@gmail.com>, freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, FreeBSD-Questions <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: UFS2 optimization for many small files Message-ID: <b41c75520707011154v495925f6u20f6b0f915d45125@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <20070701202709.L64116@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> References: <64b284310706270311j2a6af2f6i6766b483a4b66a5c@mail.gmail.com> <b41c75520707010030u25497199p1ce6b91bd1f5287c@mail.gmail.com> <20070701202709.L64116@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> > approx. 15 partitions ranging from 400 GB to 2 TB in size. If the > > server for some reason had crashed the webservers were unable to > > the question is about the reason it crashed... > > > access the nfs-mounted partitions during the period the server did a > > snapshot of a partition, in order to perform a background-fsck and > > thus our website was down. So ufs2 does not scale well. Reasons not related to the nfs-server itself. FreeBSD itself was rock-solid. It was firmware-related on the storage-side. -- regards Claus When lenity and cruelty play for a kingdom, the gentlest gamester is the soonest winner. Shakespeare
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?b41c75520707011154v495925f6u20f6b0f915d45125>