From owner-freebsd-hackers Mon May 28 17:39:59 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from silby.com (cb34181-a.mdsn1.wi.home.com [24.14.173.39]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 51FF937B424 for ; Mon, 28 May 2001 17:39:57 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from silby@silby.com) Received: (qmail 67798 invoked by uid 1000); 29 May 2001 00:39:56 -0000 Received: from localhost (sendmail-bs@127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 29 May 2001 00:39:56 -0000 Date: Mon, 28 May 2001 19:39:56 -0500 (CDT) From: Mike Silbersack To: Matt Dillon Cc: John Polstra , Subject: Re: cvsup.freebsd.org I/O error In-Reply-To: <200105282234.f4SMY6x13198@earth.backplane.com> Message-ID: <20010528193755.I67783-100000@achilles.silby.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Mon, 28 May 2001, Matt Dillon wrote: > Yah, I figured that out... I hadn't even considered it could happen with > a brand new IBM drive! Ah well... back to the > tried-and-true-but-run-slightly-hot seacrates. > > -Matt Unfortunately, it sounds like you're not alone. If you check out various hardware message boards, there are people hopping mad about recent IBM drives having a high failure rate. :| But they support tagged queueing, so you can safely write cache! :) Mike "Silby" Silbersack To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message