From owner-cvs-ports@FreeBSD.ORG  Mon Feb  7 09:05:16 2011
Return-Path: <owner-cvs-ports@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B3BA5106564A
	for <cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org>; Mon,  7 Feb 2011 09:05:16 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from pav@FreeBSD.org)
Received: from raven.customer.vol.cz (raven.customer.vol.cz [195.250.144.108])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 449D88FC21
	for <cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org>; Mon,  7 Feb 2011 09:05:16 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from pav.hide.vol.cz (nat-application.b1.lan.prg.vol.cz
	[195.122.204.152]) (authenticated bits=0)
	by raven.customer.vol.cz (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id p1795AMv087913
	(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO);
	Mon, 7 Feb 2011 10:05:13 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from pav@FreeBSD.org)
Message-ID: <4D4FB5C5.2070404@FreeBSD.org>
Date: Mon, 07 Feb 2011 10:05:09 +0100
From: Pav Lucistnik <pav@FreeBSD.org>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US;
	rv:1.9.2.13) Gecko/20101214 Thunderbird/3.1.7
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Gerald Pfeifer <gerald@pfeifer.com>
References: <201101152257.p0FMvSTR058827@repoman.freebsd.org>
	<alpine.LNX.2.00.1101152358150.2354@gerinyyl.fvgr>
	<20110128212637.GB4687@lonesome.com>
	<alpine.LNX.2.00.1102022359120.14698@gerinyyl.fvgr>
	<1297028744.16814.33.camel@hood.oook.cz>
	<alpine.LNX.2.00.1102062342430.8943@gerinyyl>
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LNX.2.00.1102062342430.8943@gerinyyl>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.68 on 195.250.144.108
X-Milter: Spamilter (Reciever: raven.customer.vol.cz;
	Sender-ip: 195.122.204.152; Sender-helo: pav.hide.vol.cz; )
Cc: cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org, ports-committers@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/graphics/metapixel Makefile distinfo
X-BeenThere: cvs-ports@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: CVS commit messages for the ports tree <cvs-ports.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-ports>,
	<mailto:cvs-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/cvs-ports>
List-Post: <mailto:cvs-ports@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cvs-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-ports>,
	<mailto:cvs-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 Feb 2011 09:05:16 -0000

On 2011/02/07 00:18, Gerald Pfeifer wrote:

> (In my experience maintainers have been quite responsive, in fact I
> was truely impressed how 80% responded within days around the CPPFLAGS
> change.)

Guess your experience here is quite better than mine. Maybe it's because 
you peddle wanted fixes and I usually report unwanted breakages? :)

My point was that you're never going to get 100% here, so in the end, 
there always be some sum of work that will end being done by you.

Note that portmgr will issue you a blanket approval on changes to 
individual ports regarding your infrastructure work.

Of course it is always good to work with maintainers. It's more 
considerate to alert maintainer of the change than just go and change 
the port behind his back.

-- 
Pav Lucistnik <pav@oook.cz>
               <pav@FreeBSD.org>