From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Mar 23 00:16:07 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id AAA04083 for freebsd-stable-outgoing; Mon, 23 Mar 1998 00:16:07 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from dyson.iquest.net (dyson.iquest.net [198.70.144.127]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id AAA04024 for ; Mon, 23 Mar 1998 00:15:56 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from toor@dyson.iquest.net) Received: (from root@localhost) by dyson.iquest.net (8.8.8/8.8.8) id DAA15803; Mon, 23 Mar 1998 03:15:16 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from toor) From: "John S. Dyson" Message-Id: <199803230815.DAA15803@dyson.iquest.net> Subject: Re: state of NFS in -stable ? In-Reply-To: from Tom at "Mar 22, 98 10:40:32 pm" To: tom@uniserve.com (Tom) Date: Mon, 23 Mar 1998 03:15:16 -0500 (EST) Cc: mark@vmunix.com, stable@FreeBSD.ORG X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL32 (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk > > On Mon, 23 Mar 1998, Mark Mayo wrote: > > > Hi all. I was just curious if the round of changes to NFS (specifically > > the client) by John Dyson in -CURRENT made it back into -STABLE?? > > I doubt it, as these changes caused some *serious* problems in current. > They would likely require extension changes to even apply to stable, > assuming that they are relevant. > I agree. Even if the fixes are applicable, it is MUCH too late to move into the stable tree for 2.2.6. The complexity of the fixes is too great even for a release in a few months. There is even more to do!!! :-(. John To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message