From owner-freebsd-performance@FreeBSD.ORG  Thu Jun  2 15:40:01 2011
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-performance@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F9A21065670;
	Thu,  2 Jun 2011 15:40:01 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from ivoras@gmail.com)
Received: from mail-yi0-f54.google.com (mail-yi0-f54.google.com
	[209.85.218.54])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 32BFC8FC15;
	Thu,  2 Jun 2011 15:40:01 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by yie12 with SMTP id 12so610909yie.13
	for <multiple recipients>; Thu, 02 Jun 2011 08:40:00 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
	h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from
	:date:x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type;
	bh=gZ9YV/NMgeOG7ai+jhDsHgW3W0NNQX7ebUNmshtMQcs=;
	b=G+xyWI8IpU6HI7zbiOLQBBepAVjCjsSMwM6ij1DnDLpB33aaZO66oBZa+ZoKqQ7UNA
	GjXjLNKeqq+2WVhSkRkPpbh7y/XSi4J8rmhNsxb6mTaKEKwf/QQvq2d+GreFyEnMgZmM
	9GUNp1kiSfh4ywRHdo3H+KxpVvntrLZp7IZok=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
	h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date
	:x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type;
	b=ChIB/sXXz7vxfJ4MnVgSohrkoru/RCHLleGJYnqYjG39oJTdhWqfQk8N4V8Qrshw3s
	Xq7qM8Lv1gMKyfTh+j20jesJeB6glENBpnb06V6UgjSGraORkWUPvFZeT1iJwi7tXnv+
	InpwAgqJqMKhjxj3bcnIIUNWBqm9iX13mi0Ws=
Received: by 10.91.182.3 with SMTP id j3mr783802agp.66.1307027671258; Thu, 02
	Jun 2011 08:14:31 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Sender: ivoras@gmail.com
Received: by 10.100.3.15 with HTTP; Thu, 2 Jun 2011 08:13:51 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <4DE79D2F.8050907@FreeBSD.org>
References: <4DE61E6F.1010209@FreeBSD.org> <is7u3u$jhf$1@dough.gmane.org>
	<4DE79D2F.8050907@FreeBSD.org>
From: Ivan Voras <ivoras@freebsd.org>
Date: Thu, 2 Jun 2011 17:13:51 +0200
X-Google-Sender-Auth: I1ZgZ0ODQ7ZCU7Pw1GazxsPNTPM
Message-ID: <BANLkTinzNUYyxxVnZN=NLNFHNsKswhBvgQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Andriy Gapon <avg@freebsd.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Cc: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: tlb shootdown
X-BeenThere: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Performance/tuning <freebsd-performance.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-performance>,
	<mailto:freebsd-performance-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-performance>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-performance@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-performance-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-performance>,
	<mailto:freebsd-performance-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 02 Jun 2011 15:40:01 -0000

On 2 June 2011 16:24, Andriy Gapon <avg@freebsd.org> wrote:
> on 02/06/2011 15:02 Ivan Voras said the following:
>> On 01/06/2011 13:11, Andriy Gapon wrote:
>>>
>>> Anyone knows of a benchmark/test that can measure/demonstrate difference in tlb
>>> shootdown performance (or its lack)?
>>
>> The "tlb" utility from lmbench may help you.
>
> Just because it's named tlb and I asked for tlb something? :)

No, because it satisfies one thing you asked for:  measuring tlb
shootdown performance:

./tlb -c
tlb: 16 pages 0.75218 nanoseconds

If you look at the code, this is probably exactly what you need: the
difference between the case with tlb misses and without.