From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Oct 1 09:28:49 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F9C316A41F for ; Sat, 1 Oct 2005 09:28:49 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from psilotum.ptt2@gmail.com) Received: from qproxy.gmail.com (qproxy.gmail.com [72.14.204.203]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8DD9743D46 for ; Sat, 1 Oct 2005 09:28:48 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from psilotum.ptt2@gmail.com) Received: by qproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id o12so73107qba for ; Sat, 01 Oct 2005 02:28:47 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=C3VxE3aH2AKitzBDX6D/58QCDcso9Ad9cdgBMfKo5F//EnHCV4zXaceRUWQapx/xhSE1ST7Tz84HaoL1U9xz8rIQ6vXepd7DTpy0jfL93v7wYv8xh7jgEaD7/O2s4uS8RH9kcLb6b+dC6eNaJp9HB2XWJEmfxExiy9nCtuD5U6c= Received: by 10.64.184.2 with SMTP id h2mr32261qbf; Sat, 01 Oct 2005 02:22:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.65.43.5 with HTTP; Sat, 1 Oct 2005 02:22:02 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <42b6915e0510010222y285194a2wf581c70cbbfffbf@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sat, 1 Oct 2005 17:22:02 +0800 From: "Lin, Cheng-tao(psilotum)" To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <433D8AE8.3060106@gwch.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: <433D8AE8.3060106@gwch.net> Cc: Subject: Re: FreeBSD6.0-Beta5 / Gnome2 / PF -> bad combination? X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: "Lin, Cheng-tao\(psilotum\)" List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 01 Oct 2005 09:28:49 -0000 hi Grosswiler: I've encountered such situation(but actually it wasn't with pf, i just modified the default value of sysctl net.inet.tcp.blackhole and gnome started slowly), I hope this may solve your problem: http://www.freebsd.org/gnome/docs/faq2.html#q20 regards, cheng-tao On 10/1/05, Roger Grosswiler wrote: > i updated to 6.0 Beta5, which did my UMA-Lock. This has gone. But still, > Gnome needs minutes to get on Desktop. > > If pf is enabled (with standard-rules enabled in /etc/pf.conf) it takes > minutes to get the desktop. Disabling pf brings the desktop up in seconds= . > > Problem: i don't get any message in my logs i could send with. Does > anybody know about an issue with pf and gnome? > > Thx, > Roger >