From owner-freebsd-net  Sat Dec 11 12:22:30 1999
Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
Received: from zippy.cdrom.com (zippy.cdrom.com [204.216.27.228])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 7B9B214DA3; Sat, 11 Dec 1999 12:22:28 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from jkh@zippy.cdrom.com)
Received: from zippy.cdrom.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by zippy.cdrom.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id MAA91413;
	Sat, 11 Dec 1999 12:21:30 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from jkh@zippy.cdrom.com)
To: csg@waterspout.com (C. Stephen Gunn)
Cc: wollman@LITTLE-CHOCOLATE-DONUTS.MIT.EDU, wpaul@FreeBSD.ORG,
	freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: Who's using 802.1Q VLAN Support? 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Fri, 10 Dec 1999 01:07:26 EST."
             <19991210060731.CB18D59@dustdevil.waterspout.com> 
Date: Sat, 11 Dec 1999 12:21:30 -0800
Message-ID: <91409.944943690@zippy.cdrom.com>
From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@zippy.cdrom.com>
Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org

> With lots of further testing, these patches do defintely help.  I
> still can't reliably debug an mbuf crash that happens within 5-10
> minutes of bringing up the vlans with some traffic though.  All 
> the backtrace tells me is that someone smashed the buffer. <sigh>

Can you send them to me in one batch, ready to commit relative to
-stable?  It would save me some time in aggregating PRs, and you
should be able to pull them out with a cvs diff on the relevant
portion of your local tree.

> Now it's in the -STABLE branch, which it ain't.  My patches do fix
> problems in the code, but it's not functional enough for -STABLE
> IMNSHO.  (No Offense to Bill & Garrett's free-time-constraied, and
> appreciated efforts)

Understood, but since it's there already we might as well at least
make it something less than an open manhole, waiting to swallow the
unwary pedestrian. :)

- Jordan


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message