From owner-cvs-all  Tue Sep 17  7:34:42 2002
Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id C168837B404; Tue, 17 Sep 2002 07:34:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from axl.seasidesoftware.co.za (axl.seasidesoftware.co.za [196.31.7.201])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 61A1B43E4A; Tue, 17 Sep 2002 07:34:39 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from sheldonh@starjuice.net)
Received: from sheldonh by axl.seasidesoftware.co.za with local (Exim 4.10)
	id 17rJQu-000Jz9-00; Tue, 17 Sep 2002 16:34:32 +0200
Date: Tue, 17 Sep 2002 16:34:32 +0200
From: Sheldon Hearn <sheldonh@starjuice.net>
To: Maxim Sobolev <sobomax@FreeBSD.org>
Cc: Boris Popov <bp@FreeBSD.org>, cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org,
	cvs-all@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/netsmb smb_conn.h smb_smb.c
Message-ID: <20020917143432.GL72320@starjuice.net>
Mail-Followup-To: Maxim Sobolev <sobomax@FreeBSD.org>,
	Boris Popov <bp@FreeBSD.org>, cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org,
	cvs-all@FreeBSD.org
References: <3D85BE19.59196A84@FreeBSD.org> <Pine.BSF.4.21.0209162134040.1544-100000@lion.butya.kz> <20020916154308.GC28848@vega.vega.com> <20020917132617.GJ72320@starjuice.net> <3D8734AC.ABCC329A@FreeBSD.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <3D8734AC.ABCC329A@FreeBSD.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.1i
Sender: owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
List-ID: <cvs-all.FreeBSD.ORG>
List-Archive: <http://docs.freebsd.org/mail/> (Web Archive)
List-Help: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=help> (List Instructions)
List-Subscribe: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=subscribe%20cvs-all>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=unsubscribe%20cvs-all>
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

On (2002/09/17 16:57), Maxim Sobolev wrote:

> > This was the big benefit FreeBSD expected out of Apple's use of our code
> > -- the receipt of bugfixes and perhaps even enhancements from folks paid
> > to hack on it. :-)
> 
> This question needs more study, because patches applied by Darwin's
> hackers/Apple's engineers to BSD code aren't necesarily BSD licensed
> as well. BSDL is not a GPLV, which infects all derivative work, quite
> on contrary, I'd expect all Apple changes being APL licensed, not BSDL
> licensed.

What I was trying to put across was that we expected something from
Apple, and that we have relationships with folks there.

In Boris' case, the changes he gets back from them are back-contributed.

Ciao,
Sheldon.

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message