From owner-dev-commits-src-main@freebsd.org Sun May 9 10:30:52 2021 Return-Path: Delivered-To: dev-commits-src-main@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9457F633472; Sun, 9 May 2021 10:30:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from danfe@freebsd.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:6074::16:84]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "freefall.freebsd.org", Issuer "R3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4FdL7J3qcyz4sFP; Sun, 9 May 2021 10:30:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from danfe@freebsd.org) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=freebsd.org; s=dkim; t=1620556252; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=oPuF2n8S1bcl5ia8ifgU24PMQwdHpKvkHWvL7f486sA=; b=HRDaMCPO9tPDi4/NZzZWcQ5lZqYo9KjazdqsXXuDee3BI5aEbdzHqOzPHrGx8grsL5l91F kszHQS2iQug/OXzTXMnyOMuiJd0XOiuJt9TZ33fIPCQXlkPHdgbm4aeWp4v5E2bLiTbqFF RuYKodwhgpcatLsHQcv2ZTcmf8QQgomzYN7JtuTDpOMu5EDsY2NWn5+FpdyXJp5Wmxp+kn 7Ub/JVm1cKZzCAMHHhZpOgmAp9clHiqbu4j9Ar5zd8JsNnwlFeVtwxCQHBSwLjyIia7BKR nA9ZIpiMJCpc1QWwtxVpJhk5eTM/CRPeDfm51NrI+qAUR8uBJnj2se3H9gEJ2g== Received: by freefall.freebsd.org (Postfix, from userid 1033) id 5DA26AF1C; Sun, 9 May 2021 10:30:52 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sun, 9 May 2021 10:30:52 +0000 From: Alexey Dokuchaev To: Rene Ladan Cc: Pedro Giffuni , Randall Stewart , "src-committers@freebsd.org" , "dev-commits-src-all@freebsd.org" , "dev-commits-src-main@freebsd.org" Subject: Re: git: 5a4333a5378f - main - This takes Warners suggested approach to making it so that platforms that for whatever reason cannot include the RATELIMIT option can still work with rack. It adds two dummy functions that rack will call and find out that the highest hw supported b/w is 0 (which kinda makes sense and rack is already prepared to handle). Message-ID: References: <202105072134.147LYjPn018824@gitrepo.freebsd.org> <4b297976-4b06-33a8-b390-18c01561b463@FreeBSD.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=freebsd.org; s=dkim; t=1620556252; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=oPuF2n8S1bcl5ia8ifgU24PMQwdHpKvkHWvL7f486sA=; b=Mo24tD4JkLygDLTo4VCQh7M7o8G928NVteO1/doVspbvt1JwwEDMNU4jy2EM5ht2oJztFc s/Fa87wYAbSSGtATjfklWFdFAeRarxuZe6zPneQJWNidhCJ2FYu05+PklERqt5Ls1ROtcc Amo5dbgzLBNrwZ9tEgILkFNY7tNE8b/BMGwRMqiIPV61ahC1PMRiKxwUMqGRId5Dpvy87z rCK49Ltfl3yIAQ9DFDW8Ewd1rZZtVXMIXy4fgBLg6ESVYhPSfV4LH0HqxRbL1dOU8/WXri jzm1jrA782exOjNHux7N3jBcAW82HzbvdDkolKyveKkbv0m5GHXz1Vpqmux7nw== ARC-Seal: i=1; s=dkim; d=freebsd.org; t=1620556252; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=iOWTogWP53OXOIWNY870xtpyiTrsPoAdX5OiAEaUbYzuFm8qmbsSp+E8FLoZ5fhb44pTCF qvTErN87HaG11Vy5ZjvkVtAwl7SzV6J27tdHNR6mloeB++FZcsO9CF6OEHxRm4FF4VgWJ+ Hio5OYP2Iwg9gRB+vIL/rI9AVgvMwW4+pGSQ+zuzwUJRfvSNPAW3/q47DEkzfD87bhkv5a j5BBOQtYJLwy4zQVhqUMXB9uXLrTtUNPZF8D+lK6VFJANjH5Cgkg7q0tixGAWypkjM4SOS 9j7KLJ+sQXsfymGk3NTT74jIgR0UOP/4p3xMFqC7ms7cLaZzM4hnQXfskVHjcA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx1.freebsd.org; none X-BeenThere: dev-commits-src-main@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: Commit messages for the main branch of the src repository List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 09 May 2021 10:30:52 -0000 On Sun, May 09, 2021 at 10:24:54AM +0000, Rene Ladan wrote: > On Sat, May 08, 2021 at 07:05:16AM +0000, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote: > > On Sat, May 08, 2021 at 12:22:24AM -0500, Pedro Giffuni wrote: > > > ... > > > +1 even in git this breaks the shortlog in ugly ways. > > > > Someone(tm) should probably file an issue at their upstream, as ignoring \n > > and only stopping at \n\n for short log definitely looks like a bug to me. > > No, because shortlog looks at the first paragraph, not the first sentence. Which is a bug, as it conflicts with the meaning of the word "short" and just makes no sense. ./danfe