Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2001 13:19:29 -0700 From: Nate Williams <nate@yogotech.com> To: Garrett Wollman <wollman@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu> Cc: <ksemat@wawa.eahd.or.ug>, <security@FreeBSD.ORG> Subject: Re: Fwd: Vendors For WU-FTPD Please Read Message-ID: <15354.47825.468400.219954@caddis.yogotech.com> In-Reply-To: <200111201945.fAKJjP038014@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu> References: <Pine.LNX.4.10.10111201104060.988-100000@ruby.ccmr.cornell.edu> <Pine.LNX.4.33.0111202023100.28220-100000@sanyu1.sanyutel.com> <200111201945.fAKJjP038014@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> <<On Tue, 20 Nov 2001 20:25:46 +0300 (EAT), <ksemat@wawa.eahd.or.ug> said: > > > rdist is an interesting approach for keeping multiple machine upto date. > > Unfortunately (and I can speak from experience) rdist's protocol is > fairly brain-dead and runs in lock-step, thus dramatically bloating > the time it takes to do even a null update on a large file set. If > there were another option that did what rdist does, I'd switch in an > instant. > CVSup? :) Nate To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?15354.47825.468400.219954>