From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 24 17:07:31 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD06916A4CE for ; Mon, 24 Jan 2005 17:07:31 +0000 (GMT) Received: from srv1.cosmo-project.de (srv1.cosmo-project.de [213.83.6.106]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0E20143D2F for ; Mon, 24 Jan 2005 17:07:31 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ticso@cicely12.cicely.de) Received: from cicely5.cicely.de (cicely5.cicely.de [10.1.1.7]) (authenticated bits=0)j0OH7KHo057326 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=OK); Mon, 24 Jan 2005 18:07:21 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from ticso@cicely12.cicely.de) Received: from cicely12.cicely.de (cicely12.cicely.de [IPv6:3ffe:400:8d0:301::12]) by cicely5.cicely.de (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id j0OH6iU3043085 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Mon, 24 Jan 2005 18:06:45 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from ticso@cicely12.cicely.de) Received: from cicely12.cicely.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cicely12.cicely.de (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id j0OH6iEu021153; Mon, 24 Jan 2005 18:06:44 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from ticso@cicely12.cicely.de) Received: (from ticso@localhost) by cicely12.cicely.de (8.12.11/8.12.11/Submit) id j0OH6i1C021152; Mon, 24 Jan 2005 18:06:44 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from ticso) Date: Mon, 24 Jan 2005 18:06:43 +0100 From: Bernd Walter To: "Andrew L. Neporada" Message-ID: <20050124170643.GG628@cicely12.cicely.de> References: <20050122205818.GA1411@nas.dgap.mipt.ru> <20050122.145221.52964235.imp@bsdimp.com> <20050123104246.GA2984@nas.dgap.mipt.ru> <20050123203516.GT628@cicely12.cicely.de> <20050124170008.GA6817@nas.dgap.mipt.ru> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20050124170008.GA6817@nas.dgap.mipt.ru> X-Operating-System: FreeBSD cicely12.cicely.de 5.2-CURRENT alpha User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.9 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=2.64 X-Spam-Report: * -4.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1% * [score: 0.0000] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.64 (2004-01-11) on cicely12.cicely.de cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org cc: ticso@cicely.de Subject: Re: "configured irq .. is not in bitmap of probed irqs 0" -- what does it mean? X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: ticso@cicely.de List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 24 Jan 2005 17:07:31 -0000 On Mon, Jan 24, 2005 at 08:00:08PM +0300, Andrew L. Neporada wrote: > On Sun, Jan 23, 2005 at 09:35:16PM +0100, Bernd Walter wrote: > > On Sun, Jan 23, 2005 at 01:42:46PM +0300, Andrew L. Neporada wrote: > > > On Sat, Jan 22, 2005 at 02:52:21PM -0700, M. Warner Losh wrote: > > > > > > > > Chances are you don't have things configured quite correctly in the > > > > bios. The interrupts aren't asserting proplerly. > > > > > > Interrupts 3,4,10,11 are reserved for ISA cards in BIOS. > > > Tweaking "PnP aware OS [Y/N]" setting doesn't help. > > > I've tried to tweak all relevant (IMO) BIOS settings without any effect :-( > > > > The question is if the card is configured to issue int10 and 11 for > > sio1 and sio2. > > Err.. Do you mean sio2 & sio3 here? Yes. > > The probing sounds like you get no interrupt at all, but since the int > > probing waits for unassigned interrupts the test may fail for special > > systems or BIOS setups. > > > [snip] > > > > Test tranfering data at any speed and check vmstat -i output if you > > got interrupts for it. > > Everything works fine at 57600 & 115200 bod (tested with a simple > program that sends data between sio2 & sio3). > > vmstat -i: > > interrupt total rate > ata0 irq14 10793 8 > ata1 irq15 15442 11 > rl0 irq9 32249 24 > atkbd0 irq1 2 0 > sio0 irq4 6 0 > sio1 irq3 7 0 > sio2 irq10 981321 757 > sio3 irq11 981382 757 > clk irq0 129329 99 > rtc irq8 165557 127 > Total 2316081 1788 Looks like everything is fine and the message is just false alarm. -- B.Walter BWCT http://www.bwct.de bernd@bwct.de info@bwct.de