From owner-freebsd-chat Sun Jun 15 22:44:48 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id WAA16558 for chat-outgoing; Sun, 15 Jun 1997 22:44:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ethanol.gnu.ai.mit.edu (we-refuse-to-spy-on-our-users@ethanol.gnu.ai.mit.edu [128.52.46.64]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id WAA16553 for ; Sun, 15 Jun 1997 22:44:46 -0700 (PDT) Received: by ethanol.gnu.ai.mit.edu (8.8.5/8.6.12GNU) id BAA16861; Mon, 16 Jun 1997 01:44:41 -0400 Date: Mon, 16 Jun 1997 01:44:41 -0400 Message-Id: <199706160544.BAA16861@ethanol.gnu.ai.mit.edu> From: "Joel N. Weber II" To: chat@freebsd.org Subject: TCL x-url: http://www.red-bean.com/~nemo x-attribution: nemo x-foobar: Practice random senselessness and act kind of beautiful. Sender: owner-chat@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk Does anyone want to offer any specific details about why they disagree with RMS about TCL, or does everyone want to just say `RMS is a moron' without providing any specific comments? (RMS has provided some convincing arguments. So far, I don't think the people on this list have provided any serious counterarguements.)