From owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 9 15:27:28 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B433316A4CE; Tue, 9 Dec 2003 15:27:28 -0800 (PST) Received: from kientzle.com (h-66-166-149-50.SNVACAID.covad.net [66.166.149.50]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A87A43D28; Tue, 9 Dec 2003 15:27:27 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from kientzle@acm.org) Received: from acm.org ([66.166.149.54]) by kientzle.com (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id hB9NRQkX020953; Tue, 9 Dec 2003 15:27:26 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from kientzle@acm.org) Message-ID: <3FD65A5D.6060407@acm.org> Date: Tue, 09 Dec 2003 15:27:25 -0800 From: Tim Kientzle User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20031006 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: obrien@FreeBSD.org References: <200312072352.hB7Nqsw6011333@repoman.freebsd.org> <20031208190305.GA956@cirb503493.alcatel.com.au> <20031209070020.GC59494@perrin.nxad.com> <20031209165827.GA18959@dragon.nuxi.com> In-Reply-To: <20031209165827.GA18959@dragon.nuxi.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: Scott Long cc: src-committers@FreeBSD.org cc: Sean Chittenden cc: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org cc: cvs-src@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/i386/conf GENERIC src/sys/alpha/confGENERIC src/sys/sparc64/conf GENERIC src/sys/amd64/conf GENERIC src/sys/pc98/conf GENERIC X-BeenThere: cvs-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: kientzle@acm.org List-Id: CVS commit messages for the entire tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Dec 2003 23:27:28 -0000 David O'Brien wrote: > On Mon, Dec 08, 2003 at 11:00:20PM -0800, Sean Chittenden wrote: > >> ... Moving from gzip to bzip2 for the base files reduces the >>current size of the base files by about 13-22%. > > I've been trying to move us to bzip2 for the base distribution files > since 4.6 (2 years now). RE has blocked it before ... Two observations: 1) bunzip2 requires almost 4MB of memory, compared to gunzip's 600KB. 2) bunzip2 is about 10x slower than gunzip on my system. (Decompressing the openoffice tarball: 42s vs. 4s) Switching to bzip2 format could significantly slow installs and/or boost minimum memory requirements. Has anyone built a set of bzip2 install CDs and measured the time hit and/or memory requirements? Tim