From owner-freebsd-gecko@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Apr 5 09:10:12 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: gecko@hub.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7DFE7106564A for ; Tue, 5 Apr 2011 09:10:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::28]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5217C8FC15 for ; Tue, 5 Apr 2011 09:10:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p359ACNq059936 for ; Tue, 5 Apr 2011 09:10:12 GMT (envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.4/8.14.4/Submit) id p359ACRI059935; Tue, 5 Apr 2011 09:10:12 GMT (envelope-from gnats) Date: Tue, 5 Apr 2011 09:10:12 GMT Message-Id: <201104050910.p359ACRI059935@freefall.freebsd.org> To: gecko@FreeBSD.org From: Beat Gaetzi Cc: Subject: Re: ports/155949: www/firefox: firefox 4, WITH_PGO, better Text against DISPLAY problem X-BeenThere: freebsd-gecko@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Beat Gaetzi List-Id: Gecko Rendering Engine issues List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Apr 2011 09:10:12 -0000 The following reply was made to PR ports/155949; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Beat Gaetzi To: Bernhard Froehlich Cc: bug-followup@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: ports/155949: www/firefox: firefox 4, WITH_PGO, better Text against DISPLAY problem Date: Tue, 05 Apr 2011 11:01:05 +0200 On 04.04.2011 13:29, Bernhard Froehlich wrote: > I think the cleanest solution would be a check before starting build to > detect if X is available or not. (ideally configure or otherwise port > Makefile) But if we are talking about PGO removal do we have some > numbers how much speed you gain? I don't feel any differences on my > machine and JS benchmarks are about the same. Mozilla ships his own > Firefox binaries all without PGO so I'm not sure about the support of > that optimizations. I don't know how we should or can test that X is available or not. Please note I don't think that we should remove PGO from the port in general I propose to remove it only from OPTIONS. Although I do not have numbers what we gain with PGO from my subjective experience when using Firefox I think it act faster when building with PGO. Beat