Date: Mon, 12 Nov 2012 09:47:59 -0800 From: Alfred Perlstein <bright@mu.org> To: Andre Oppermann <andre@freebsd.org> Cc: "alc@freebsd.org" <alc@freebsd.org>, Konstantin Belousov <kostikbel@gmail.com>, Alan Cox <alan.l.cox@gmail.com>, "Sears, Steven" <Steven.Sears@netapp.com>, "freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org" <freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Memory reserves or lack thereof Message-ID: <22625087-4579-44AA-9633-CA81FAF6E8E7@mu.org> In-Reply-To: <50A0E77C.6010108@freebsd.org> References: <A6DE036C6A90C949A25CE89E844237FB2086970A@SACEXCMBX01-PRD.hq.netapp.com> <20121110132019.GP73505@kib.kiev.ua> <CAJUyCcOKHH3TO6qaK9V7UY2HW%2Bp6T74DUUdmbSi4eeGyofrTdQ@mail.gmail.com> <50A0E77C.6010108@freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Nov 12, 2012, at 4:11 AM, Andre Oppermann <andre@freebsd.org> wrote: > > > I don't think many places depend on M_NOWAIT digging deep. I'm > perfectly happy with having M_NOWAIT give up on first try. Only > together with M_TRY_REALLY_HARD it would dig into reserves. > > PS: We have a really nasty namespace collision with the mbuf flags > which use the M_* prefix as well. Agreed. >
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?22625087-4579-44AA-9633-CA81FAF6E8E7>