From owner-freebsd-arch Fri Aug 31 11:53:10 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Received: from dragon.nuxi.com (dsl092-013-169.sfo1.dsl.speakeasy.net [66.92.13.169]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5FEE037B40B; Fri, 31 Aug 2001 11:53:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from obrien@localhost) by dragon.nuxi.com (8.11.5/8.11.1) id f7VIr0d22086; Fri, 31 Aug 2001 11:53:00 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from obrien) Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2001 11:53:00 -0700 From: "David O'Brien" To: Alexander Langer Cc: Ruslan Ermilov , arch@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/share/mk sys.mk Message-ID: <20010831115300.A21541@dragon.nuxi.com> Reply-To: obrien@FreeBSD.ORG References: <200108311118.f7VBIO124920@freefall.freebsd.org> <20010831142958.A60910@sunbay.com> <20010831141746.A1809@zerogravity.kawo2.rwth-aachen.d> <20010831084811.B95710@dragon.nuxi.com> <20010831184945.A16872@fump.kawo2.rwth-aachen.de> <20010831100216.A17397@dragon.nuxi.com> <20010831193947.A17086@fump.kawo2.rwth-aachen.de> <20010831110121.B21276@dragon.nuxi.com> <20010831202529.B17086@fump.kawo2.rwth-aachen.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <20010831202529.B17086@fump.kawo2.rwth-aachen.de>; from alex@big.endian.de on Fri, Aug 31, 2001 at 08:25:29PM +0200 X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 5.0-CURRENT Organization: The NUXI BSD group X-Pgp-Rsa-Fingerprint: B7 4D 3E E9 11 39 5F A3 90 76 5D 69 58 D9 98 7A X-Pgp-Rsa-Keyid: 1024/34F9F9D5 Sender: owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Fri, Aug 31, 2001 at 08:25:29PM +0200, Alexander Langer wrote: > Thus spake David O'Brien (obrien@FreeBSD.ORG): > > > > - A patch to bsd.port.mk has already been submitted to portmgr@ and > > > is under development. > > Can you post the patch? > > --- bsd.port.mk 2001/08/27 00:09:05 1.377 > +++ bsd.port.mk 2001/08/29 19:48:46 > @@ -489,6 +489,10 @@ > > _PREMKINCLUDED= yes > > +.if exists(/etc/ports.conf) > +.include > +.endif This is what I expected. Has this been tested? Someone mentioned, correctly, on ports@ that ports.conf will be read after the invidual port's Makefile, where as /etc/make.conf is read before. How does this affect the typical values that one might put in ports.conf? > Users probably want to use BDECFLAGS in the non-world context, understandable > I also don't really like it in sys.mk. Why? > However, bsd.prog.mk could be a correct place, though I don't like to > pollution of this file with a variable like this. bsd.prog.mk is not used for all make invocations. -- -- David (obrien@FreeBSD.org) To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message