From owner-freebsd-questions Tue Jan 16 10:31:41 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from be-well.ilk.org (lowellg.ne.mediaone.net [24.147.184.128]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 06DB637B400 for ; Tue, 16 Jan 2001 10:31:24 -0800 (PST) Received: (from lowell@localhost) by be-well.ilk.org (8.11.1/8.11.1) id f0GIVNk69294; Tue, 16 Jan 2001 13:31:23 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from lowell) To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 4.2-STABLE = 4.2-RELEASE? References: <3A643FF4.1B3CEAB2@urx.com> From: Lowell Gilbert Date: 16 Jan 2001 13:31:21 -0500 In-Reply-To: kstewart@urx.com's message of "16 Jan 2001 13:35:27 +0100" Message-ID: <448zob5oxy.fsf@lowellg.ne.mediaone.net> Lines: 14 X-Mailer: Gnus v5.7/Emacs 20.7 Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG kstewart@urx.com (Kent Stewart) writes: > Danny Yoo wrote: > > > > I wasn't able to get into the ports collection on my 4.2-STABLE box through > > sysinstall until I changed one of the options to 4.2-RELEASE. Is there a > > difference? I upgraded recently (a few days ago) from 4.1. Which is more > > recent, STABLE or RELEASE? > > Neither, the only real tag for ports is "." or -current. Not quite right. There *are* tags for releases, there just aren't any branches. I don't really understand the original question, though, so I'm not sure if it's relevant. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message