From owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG  Tue Jan 15 17:10:01 2013
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-bugs@smarthost.ysv.freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org
 [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1])
 by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 82E5435C
 for <freebsd-bugs@smarthost.ysv.freebsd.org>;
 Tue, 15 Jan 2013 17:10:01 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org)
Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org
 [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206c::16:87])
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 711E186C
 for <freebsd-bugs@smarthost.ysv.freebsd.org>;
 Tue, 15 Jan 2013 17:10:01 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.6/8.14.6) with ESMTP id r0FHA1bn050404
 for <freebsd-bugs@freefall.freebsd.org>; Tue, 15 Jan 2013 17:10:01 GMT
 (envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org)
Received: (from gnats@localhost)
 by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.6/8.14.6/Submit) id r0FHA1Mv050403;
 Tue, 15 Jan 2013 17:10:01 GMT (envelope-from gnats)
Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2013 17:10:01 GMT
Message-Id: <201301151710.r0FHA1Mv050403@freefall.freebsd.org>
To: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org
Cc: 
From: Allen Landsidel <landsidel.allen@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: bin/166589: atacontrol(8) incorrectly treats RAID10 and 0+1 the
 same
X-BeenThere: freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Allen Landsidel <landsidel.allen@gmail.com>
List-Id: Bug reports <freebsd-bugs.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-bugs>,
 <mailto:freebsd-bugs-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-bugs>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-bugs-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-bugs>,
 <mailto:freebsd-bugs-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2013 17:10:01 -0000

The following reply was made to PR bin/166589; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Allen Landsidel <landsidel.allen@gmail.com>
To: Alexander Motin <mav@FreeBSD.org>
Cc: bug-followup@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: bin/166589: atacontrol(8) incorrectly treats RAID10 and 0+1 the
 same
Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2013 12:09:29 -0500

 The atacontrol(8) man page and handbook page on RAID (19.4.2) both 
 discuss (briefly) hardware RAID and say it is supported.
 
 It seems you're calling all the southbridge controllers "software" 
 RAID?  That terminology in my experience is used to describe gmirror/ccd 
 disks without a RAID controller or RAID BIOS.
 
 In any case, the difference and PR still remain.
 
 A 6 disk RAID-10 controller ((1,2),(3,4),(5,6)) with failed disks 1, & 4 
 (or even 1,3 & 5) will boot and allow you to do your 'magic.'
 
 A 6 disk RAID0+1 controller ((1,2,3),(4,5,6)) with failed disks 1 & 4 
 will not boot the OS.
 
 Misrepresenting one as the other in the software is wrong.
 
 
 On 1/15/2013 11:35, Alexander Motin wrote:
 > Please, be my guest to show me where atacontrol(8) controls any hardware
 > RAID controller, or anything except ataraid(4) at all.
 >
 >