Date: Thu, 9 Dec 2004 20:39:27 -0800 From: Pascal Hofstee <caelian@gmail.com> To: Dirk Meyer <dinoex@freebsd.org> Cc: ports-committers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/x11-toolkits/gnustep-gui Makefile Message-ID: <d8a0b762041209203926a5148f@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <200412092350.iB9NoSi1097028@repoman.freebsd.org> References: <200412092350.iB9NoSi1097028@repoman.freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, 9 Dec 2004 23:50:28 +0000 (UTC), Dirk Meyer <dinoex@freebsd.org> wrote: > dinoex 2004-12-09 23:50:28 UTC > > FreeBSD ports repository > > Modified files: > x11-toolkits/gnustep-gui Makefile > Log: > - mark IGNORE when procfs is not present Ehrm ... To my knowledge (running GNUstep CVS on 6.0-CURRENT without procfs here) .. gnustep-gui is Only dependent on procfs if gnustep-base is compiled with procfs support .. which the FreeBSD port of gnustep-base EXPLICITELY disables by the --disable-procfs in our gnustep-base port's Makefile. So .. since we don't build our gnustep-base without procfs .. gnustep-gui doesn't need it either ... Is there any specific reason why this commit has been made to gnustep-gui ? It appears to be bogus as the actual procfs dependency is determined in gnustep-base. (where we explicitely disable it) Would anyone be able to clarify this issue ? -- Pascal Hofstee
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?d8a0b762041209203926a5148f>