Date: Thu, 17 Jul 2014 03:21:22 +0000 From: Alexey Dokuchaev <danfe@FreeBSD.org> To: Adam Weinberger <adamw@adamw.org> Cc: svn-ports-head@freebsd.org, Baptiste Daroussin <bapt@FreeBSD.org>, svn-ports-all@freebsd.org, ports-committers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r362040 - head/devel/gmake-lite Message-ID: <20140717032122.GA59585@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <4B40AB33-1184-433F-AAFE-A329B0C4BD68@adamw.org> References: <201407160644.s6G6iIiY091220@svn.freebsd.org> <4B40AB33-1184-433F-AAFE-A329B0C4BD68@adamw.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 11:12:52PM -0400, Adam Weinberger wrote: > On 16 Jul, 2014, at 2:44, Baptiste Daroussin <bapt@FreeBSD.org> wrote: > > New Revision: 362040 > > URL: http://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/ports/362040 > > QAT: https://qat.redports.org/buildarchive/r362040/ > > > > Log: > > Ensure gmake-lite never tries to build documentation > > > > Modified: > > head/devel/gmake-lite/Makefile > > What's the deal with gmake-lite? There's no info about it in CHANGES, > UPDATING, the PHB, Uses/gmake.mk, or on ports-announce@. Am I supposed > to be using it as a porter? As a user? >From commit log, it was added to simplify the process of removing texinfo and groff from base (avoid circular dependencies). I would assume that it is just a temporary measure and hope it will die soon. I do not think that anyone (or anything) should be using it instead of "normal" make(1) or gmake(1). ./danfe
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20140717032122.GA59585>