Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 1 Jul 1998 20:03:04 -0500 (EST)
From:      Andrew Short <Ashort@concentric.net>
To:        Doug White <dwhite@resnet.uoregon.edu>
Cc:        FreeBSD Questions Mailing List <freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>
Subject:   Re: .
Message-ID:  <Pine.SUN.3.96.980701200105.11976O-100000@viking.cris.com>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.3.96.980701175705.26370S-100000@resnet.uoregon.edu>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, 1 Jul 1998, Doug White wrote:

> > How come the package for xearth doesn't define the location of Berkeley
> > (or Walnut Creek, or SOMETHING!) in the default setup?  This IS a FreeBSD
> > binary distribution, after all.  Is there some sort of licensing "thing"
> > that says "you will distribute this marker file with xearth"? 
> 
> xearth -freebsd?

Maybe I typed it wrong.  =)   

I just thought that we could remove San Francisco from the marker file and
add either Berkeley, CA or Walnut Creek... 

-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Andrew Short                                            Colossians 3:23
ashort@concentric.net                http://www.concentric.net/~ashort/
-----------------------------------------------------------------------



To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.SUN.3.96.980701200105.11976O-100000>