From owner-freebsd-hackers  Fri Sep 19 06:21:10 1997
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-hackers>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id GAA11251
          for hackers-outgoing; Fri, 19 Sep 1997 06:21:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from godzilla.zeta.org.au (godzilla.zeta.org.au [203.2.228.19])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id GAA11243;
          Fri, 19 Sep 1997 06:21:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (from bde@localhost) by godzilla.zeta.org.au (8.8.5/8.6.9) id XAA17318; Fri, 19 Sep 1997 23:18:11 +1000
Date: Fri, 19 Sep 1997 23:18:11 +1000
From: Bruce Evans <bde@zeta.org.au>
Message-Id: <199709191318.XAA17318@godzilla.zeta.org.au>
To: bde@zeta.org.au, phk@critter.freebsd.dk
Subject: Re: Bug in malloc/free
Cc: atrens@nortel.ca, freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org, gram@cdsec.com,
        hackers@freebsd.org, julian@whistle.com, mike@smith.net.au
Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

>I still seems to me that we need a new function to mean:
>	"coredump, right now, no ifs, whens or buts. Thank you."

A new signal, like SIGKILL except it generates cores, would be useful.
We would have to fix all the assumptions that sigset_t == int to make
room for another signal number.

Bruce