Date: Tue, 7 Jul 2015 17:06:05 +0000 From: Brooks Davis <brooks@freebsd.org> To: Kubilay Kocak <koobs@FreeBSD.org> Cc: Gregory Orange <gregory.orange@calorieking.com>, ohauer@FreeBSD.org, ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: mail/postfix default build options request: SASL Message-ID: <20150707170604.GI25718@spindle.one-eyed-alien.net> In-Reply-To: <559B6791.7050407@FreeBSD.org> References: <559B643F.3060409@calorieking.com> <559B6791.7050407@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--yrj/dFKFPuw6o+aM Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Jul 07, 2015 at 03:45:53PM +1000, Kubilay Kocak wrote: > On 7/07/2015 3:31 PM, Gregory Orange wrote: > > Hi Olli and ports@, > >=20 > > I don't know if this is a helpful forum to raise it, but I would like to > > request that SASL be enabled in the default build options for > > mail/postfix. I am attempting to use binary-only packages wherever > > possible, and so far this is the first where I currently have to build > > it myself. > >=20 > > I would have thought SASL is in use across many Postfix installations, > > but of course I could be wrong. I was tempted to try out > > SMTP-after-IMAP, but since Postfix has the support, I think SASL is far > > cleaner. > >=20 > > Would any responders please include me in the CC? I am not subscribed to > > the list. > >=20 > > Thanks, > > Greg. > >=20 >=20 > If consensus can't be achieved or there is a good reason not to enable > this by default, then postfix-sasl as a slave port may be a desirable > alternative, which I believe has existed in the past. >=20 > I'm generally: >=20 > +1 on security related options enabled by default > +1 on OPTIONS_DEFAULT matching upstream defaults > -1 on OPTIONS_DEFAULT introducing large dependency sets We need a port that allows dovecot2 SASL by default. There are a bunch of turorials on setting up such systems and all of the have to start with "bui= ld everything by hand" which makes us look bad. I've been somewhat tempted to adding a slave port mail/postfix-useful with SASL, TLS, and DANE turned on. A less trollish name might be better though. :) -- Brooks --yrj/dFKFPuw6o+aM Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJVnAb8AAoJEKzQXbSebgfAxRcH/1EKpw4ZgQzr45fzJurWJsEP JZ/kTNdnb4pAUCUnlIE/Ev99iNyHwUTxlKYglqc75xz1/3NQJKhwsuca+vz1b74y zfaIEe0CXbY64f4SjqH6EvvqXz37vEorOcHi3YKE5glv0BYRFAur3KmG+kqaqL/s gSm9ZpIPiWh65TOi9ZH5Mi6pL1i6Ov72WT5r3Rd6gdRdHgsOMz0uiJqGrgQNL4lm e22Wa6sXVdFRHyCksxOFX8dsUi3ZES9xVDt/KTxoKwTL1Wr3ZOXCMOdQ3RP312e1 UhTzhWIYQwje2AOcO3hXgqywlUtltSwN4hQvdwqZGXPgksHYOi6SIvgJPRavlIM= =V72q -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --yrj/dFKFPuw6o+aM--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20150707170604.GI25718>