From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Oct 12 15:53:29 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 16F8216A403 for ; Thu, 12 Oct 2006 15:53:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from om-lists-bsd@omx.ch) Received: from omega.omnis.ch (omega.omnis.ch [195.134.143.43]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E89A843D4C for ; Thu, 12 Oct 2006 15:53:21 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from om-lists-bsd@omx.ch) Received: (qmail 23654 invoked from network); 12 Oct 2006 15:53:16 -0000 Received: from 195.134.148.35 ([195.134.148.35]) by omega.omnis.ch ([195.134.143.43]) with ESMTP via TCP; 12 Oct 2006 15:53:16 -0000 In-Reply-To: <20061012110034.6826e298.wmoran@collaborativefusion.com> References: <200610101022.33761.jhb@freebsd.org> <200610101720.k9AHKdMI099668@ambrisko.com> <20061010145315.cefa9e19.wmoran@collaborativefusion.com> <20061012144022.GV4945@poupinou.org> <20061012110034.6826e298.wmoran@collaborativefusion.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v752.2) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; delsp=yes; format=flowed Message-Id: Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable From: Olivier Mueller Date: Thu, 12 Oct 2006 17:53:12 +0200 To: Bill Moran X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.752.2) Cc: stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Dell 1950 does not properly respond to reboot and shutdown -p X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Oct 2006 15:53:29 -0000 Le 12 oct. 06 =E0 17:00, Bill Moran a =E9crit : > In response to Bruno Ducrot : >> The device_printf() function take too much time I think, so you =20 >> get the same >> behaviour as the DELAY(). > > True. Problem is that I considered that possibility, and removed the > device_printf(), rebuild the kernel, and have been unable to reproduce > the problem with a stock SMP kernel since yesterday. > > I'm seriously considering the possibility that this has been fixed, =20= > but > I'm uncomfortable that nobody can say, "Sure, I committed a fix to =20 > that > last week." I would be happy to test & help, I also have a PE1950 around waiting for this problem to be solved to go in production. I would just need to =20 have the patch. (I'll check the list archive later, I just joined =20 freebsd-stable today) Btw, it would be nice if the patched if_bce.c could also be integrated into the cvs (http://yogurt.org/FreeBSD/if_bce.c). At the moment (beg. of the week) I still had to patch the source tree by hand to keep the =20= network interface working fine (cf. thread on freebsd-hardware). Regards, Olivier