From owner-freebsd-current  Tue Apr  4 04:24:01 1995
Return-Path: current-owner
Received: (from majordom@localhost) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) id EAA10549 for current-outgoing; Tue, 4 Apr 1995 04:24:01 -0700
Received: from godzilla.zeta.org.au (godzilla.zeta.org.au [203.2.228.34]) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) with ESMTP id EAA10543 for <current@FreeBSD.org>; Tue, 4 Apr 1995 04:23:49 -0700
Received: (from bde@localhost) by godzilla.zeta.org.au (8.6.9/8.6.9) id VAA18870; Tue, 4 Apr 1995 21:21:22 +1000
Date: Tue, 4 Apr 1995 21:21:22 +1000
From: Bruce Evans <bde@zeta.org.au>
Message-Id: <199504041121.VAA18870@godzilla.zeta.org.au>
To: rkw@dataplex.net, wollman@halloran-eldar.lcs.mit.edu
Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/i386/conf Makefile.i386
Cc: current@FreeBSD.org
Sender: current-owner@FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

>> Further, the "obj" links are removed
>> from the source tree and replaced by a parallel object tree that grows from
>> the root.

>I VERY VERY VERY VERY much DISlike this.

What about a parallel object tree that is union mounted over the source?
Assume that union mounts have no bugs.

I think this would be nice for development but bad for portability.

Bruce