From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Apr 4 18:58:55 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EFBDA1065672 for ; Mon, 4 Apr 2011 18:58:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from scrappy@hub.org) Received: from hub.org (hub.org [200.46.204.220]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC3468FC0A for ; Mon, 4 Apr 2011 18:58:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: from maia.hub.org (maia-2.hub.org [200.46.204.251]) by hub.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7EA923250AA7; Mon, 4 Apr 2011 15:58:54 -0300 (ADT) Received: from hub.org ([200.46.204.220]) by maia.hub.org (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.251]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024) with ESMTP id 99983-01; Mon, 4 Apr 2011 18:58:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: by hub.org (Postfix, from userid 1002) id 4A9513250AA6; Mon, 4 Apr 2011 15:58:54 -0300 (ADT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by hub.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 441613250AA2; Mon, 4 Apr 2011 15:58:54 -0300 (ADT) Date: Mon, 4 Apr 2011 15:58:54 -0300 (ADT) From: "Marc G. Fournier" To: Chuck Swiger In-Reply-To: <0F56F33B-C492-4723-B7EC-713AD64E856C@mac.com> Message-ID: References: <0F56F33B-C492-4723-B7EC-713AD64E856C@mac.com> User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 7-STABLE NFS: fatal: "select lock: Permission denied" X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Apr 2011 18:58:56 -0000 On Mon, 4 Apr 2011, Chuck Swiger wrote: > On Apr 4, 2011, at 11:09 AM, Marc G. Fournier wrote: >> 'k, based on someone else's recommendation, I add 'nolockd' to the mount entry,a nd postfix now appears to work ... since I can safely guarantee that only the one host will have access to these files, that doesn't pose a porblem for me, but still find it a weird issue all things considered :( > > Be careful; multiple access from different processes even on a single > host can still run into locking issues against NFS filesystems, or data > corruption if locking isn't available. You're most at risk with local > delivery to an mbox-style INBOX; delivery to maildir-style INBOX is much > safer even on NFS without locking. In my case, I have postfix+cyrus-imapd ... ---- Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Hosting Solutions S.A. scrappy@hub.org http://www.hub.org Yahoo:yscrappy Skype: hub.org ICQ:7615664 MSN:scrappy@hub.org