From owner-freebsd-ports Mon Jan 13 17:27:58 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.4/8.8.4) id RAA22461 for ports-outgoing; Mon, 13 Jan 1997 17:27:58 -0800 (PST) Received: from whqvax.picker.com (whqvax.picker.com [144.54.1.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.4/8.8.4) with SMTP id RAA22429 for ; Mon, 13 Jan 1997 17:27:48 -0800 (PST) Received: from ct.picker.com by whqvax.picker.com with SMTP; Mon, 13 Jan 1997 20:24:28 -0500 (EST) Received: from elmer.ct.picker.com ([144.54.57.34]) by ct.picker.com (4.1/SMI-4.1) id AA05477; Mon, 13 Jan 97 20:22:00 EST Received: by elmer.ct.picker.com (SMI-8.6/SMI-SVR4) id UAA19313; Mon, 13 Jan 1997 20:19:31 -0500 Message-Id: Date: Mon, 13 Jan 1997 20:19:30 -0500 From: rhh@ct.picker.com (Randall Hopper) To: stesin@gu.net (Andrew Stesin), brian@mpress.com Cc: joerg_wunsch@uriah.heep.sax.de (Joerg Wunsch), ports@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: workman-atapi port - should I reupload it? References: X-Mailer: Mutt 0.56 Mime-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: ; from Andrew Stesin on Jan 13, 1997 19:04:29 +0200 Sender: owner-ports@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk Thanks to all who replied. As you guessed Brian, the SCSI mention in the man page (coupled with the facts that there once was a workman-atapi port and the device is compiled into the binary) convinced me that std workman wouldn't work with ATAPI. Just tried it, and sure enough, with the right options it works fine. It might be a good idea to update the WORKMAN port to avoid future confusion. Patch the man page to mention ATAPI as well as SCSI, if not exactly what to run for ATAPI CD-ROMs. Or supply a workman-atapi shell script as part of the package. Thanks again, Randall Hopper J Wunsch: |As Randall Hopper wrote: |> I just re-checked the current workman port (workman-1.3.tgz in |> packages-current) to verify nothing's changed: | |> > strings /usr/X11R6/bin/workman | grep ^/dev |> /dev/rcd0c | |> > strings /opt/pkg/workman/bin/workman | grep ^/dev |> /dev/rwcd0c |> |> and I have it setuid root for that reason. | |For which reason? | |And, what's wrong with ``workman -c /dev/rwcd0c''? Andrew Stesin: | ... and "plain" workman Just Works with ATAPI CDROMs for | me since long ago, if you'll just point to a right /dev/ | entry. brian@mpress.com: |Curiouser: the standard workman in packages-current/x11 does indeed |work fine with my ATAPI CDROM drive. | |I guess | |NAME | workman - play audio compact discs on a SCSI CD player | |from the man page must scare people away from that version.