From owner-freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.ORG  Wed Jan 19 12:00:55 2005
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-doc@hub.freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C3E2116A4CE
	for <freebsd-doc@hub.freebsd.org>;
	Wed, 19 Jan 2005 12:00:55 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [216.136.204.21])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A6EDB43D48
	for <freebsd-doc@hub.freebsd.org>;
	Wed, 19 Jan 2005 12:00:55 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org)
Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (gnats@localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by freefall.freebsd.org (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id j0JC0tuV001749
	for <freebsd-doc@freefall.freebsd.org>; Wed, 19 Jan 2005 12:00:55 GMT
	(envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org)
Received: (from gnats@localhost)
	by freefall.freebsd.org (8.13.1/8.13.1/Submit) id j0JC0tnA001748;
	Wed, 19 Jan 2005 12:00:55 GMT
	(envelope-from gnats)
Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2005 12:00:55 GMT
Message-Id: <200501191200.j0JC0tnA001748@freefall.freebsd.org>
To: freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.org
From: Rudolf Cejka <cejkar@fit.vutbr.cz>
Subject: Re: docs/76399: [PATCH] sendto(2) is missing possible error EISCONN
X-BeenThere: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Rudolf Cejka <cejkar@fit.vutbr.cz>
List-Id: Documentation project <freebsd-doc.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-doc>,
	<mailto:freebsd-doc-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-doc>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-doc@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-doc-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-doc>,
	<mailto:freebsd-doc-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2005 12:00:56 -0000

The following reply was made to PR docs/76399; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Rudolf Cejka <cejkar@fit.vutbr.cz>
To: bug-followup@freebsd.org
Cc:  
Subject: Re: docs/76399: [PATCH] sendto(2) is missing possible error EISCONN
Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2005 13:00:03 +0100

 Giorgos Keramidas wrote (2005/01/19):
 > A connection is made to localhost:22 (sshd must be running for this to
 > succeed), and then sendto() is used to send a packet to a different
 > host over the same socket.
 > 
 > EISCONN was never returned in 6.0-CURRENT.  The packet is AFAICT
 > silently dropped.
 > 
 > Am I doing something wrong?
 
 Oops, I'm sorry that you had to create some testing example
 - it was possible that I could send one...
 
 Just change SOCK_STREAM to SOCK_DGRAM. However, I do not understand,
 why there is a difference between SOCK_STREAM and SOCK_DGRAM, because
 I thought from ipc_usrreq.c in /usr/src/sys, that the behavioour
 should be the same.
 
 Thank you very much.
 
 -- 
 Rudolf Cejka <cejkar at fit.vutbr.cz> http://www.fit.vutbr.cz/~cejkar
 Brno University of Technology, Faculty of Information Technology
 Bozetechova 2, 612 66  Brno, Czech Republic