From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun May 29 12:06:59 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8349016A41C for ; Sun, 29 May 2005 12:06:59 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dick@nagual.st) Received: from nagual.st (cc20684-a.assen1.dr.home.nl [82.74.2.254]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E81B743D1D for ; Sun, 29 May 2005 12:06:54 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dick@nagual.st) Received: from pooh.nagual.st (pooh.nagual.st [192.168.11.22]) by nagual.st with esmtp; Sun, 29 May 2005 14:06:53 +0200 Date: Sun, 29 May 2005 14:06:53 +0200 From: dick hoogendijk To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-Id: <20050529140653.2181252d.dick@nagual.st> In-Reply-To: <20050529134323.L20141@maren.thelosingend.net> References: <20050529134323.L20141@maren.thelosingend.net> Organization: nagual SiTe X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 1.0.4 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-portbld-freebsd4.11) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: Seagate HD not detected by FreeBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: dick@nagual.st List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 29 May 2005 12:06:59 -0000 On Sun, 29 May 2005 13:49:21 +0200 (CEST) Svein Halvor Halvorsen wrote: > > * Ted Mittelstaedt [2005-05-29 00:05 -0700] > > Wrong. Each IDE cable can have 2 devices a master and a slave. So > > if you have 2 IDE controllers you can have master, slave, master, > > slave for a total of 4 drives. > > > > It is not master on ide cable 1, slave on ide cable 2. > > > There's nothing wrong with having a primary master and a secondary > slave, just as much as there is nothing wrong with the setup you > proposes. Having a slave without a master won't work! There has to be a master on an IDE cable. I have never seen it work otherwise. What is the point of setting the device to a slave device if it's the only device on the cable anyhow? -- dick -- http://nagual.st/ -- PGP/GnuPG key: F86289CE ++ Running FreeBSD 4.11 ++ FreeBSD 5.4 + Nai tiruvantel ar vayuvantel i Valar tielyanna nu vilja