From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 3 17:50:39 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C4D0B1065672; Tue, 3 Nov 2009 17:50:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from a_best01@uni-muenster.de) Received: from zivm-exrelay1.uni-muenster.de (ZIVM-EXRELAY1.UNI-MUENSTER.DE [128.176.192.14]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 28E548FC27; Tue, 3 Nov 2009 17:50:38 +0000 (UTC) X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.44,675,1249250400"; d="scan'208";a="287266192" Received: from zivmaildisp1.uni-muenster.de (HELO ZIVMAILUSER04.UNI-MUENSTER.DE) ([128.176.188.85]) by zivm-relay1.uni-muenster.de with ESMTP; 03 Nov 2009 18:50:38 +0100 Received: by ZIVMAILUSER04.UNI-MUENSTER.DE (Postfix, from userid 149459) id 1C89A1B07BE; Tue, 3 Nov 2009 18:50:38 +0100 (CET) Date: Tue, 03 Nov 2009 18:50:37 +0100 (CET) From: Alexander Best Sender: Organization: Westfaelische Wilhelms-Universitaet Muenster To: , Alexander Best Message-ID: In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Ed Schouten , freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org, pluknet , Antony Mawer , Dag-Erling Sm?rgrav , rafan@freebsd.org Subject: Re: help needed to fix contrib/ee crash/exit when receiving SIGWINCH X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 03 Nov 2009 17:50:39 -0000 Eygene Ryabinkin schrieb am 2009-11-03: > Mon, Nov 02, 2009 at 10:32:29PM +0100, Alexander Best wrote: > > ok. the pr stays in patched state. right now the patch is in HEAD, > > 8-STABLE and 8.0-RELEASE. rafan is thinking about mfc'ing the patch > > to > > 6-stable and 7-stable. however if somebody is willing to modify the > > patch so it applies to those branches that'll be great > Patch applies cleanly to the 7-STABLE, moreover, lib_getch.c from it > has the same logics and fifo_push is essentially unmodified in the > areas that are relevant for this flaw. > I had patched 7-STABLE on the test machine, brought ee from 8.x and > verified that unpatched ncurses give immediate exit, while patched > curses give working ee in respect to the SIGWINCH. > I had also mildly tested vi and sysinstall on the patched 7-STABLE > and found no visible regressions. great. so do we need/want the patch in 6.x? alex