From nobody Tue Apr 9 12:15:08 2024 X-Original-To: bugs@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4VDPzc6gKwz5GtVt for ; Tue, 9 Apr 2024 12:15:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "R3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4VDPzc5cNqz4tTy for ; Tue, 9 Apr 2024 12:15:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) ARC-Seal: i=1; s=dkim; d=freebsd.org; t=1712664908; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=Kj34NHNj2l+igVLpbs9j3blYk2K8rr4MvCEJu+XUOsLYYlFTh1IsZqVRVNCLr/c5CSwh/1 GTkX+8rT+8m489kO8waKspsWgU6+yp9f0sliRZs/xJA1C/qpQ8muilxD0k8k045ERMdFpw ARVIqd0UxFNcSVWPHjYYEDhcfNQqN3ebvKqXTMTQ1PV8Bnu6zRysHk1jxO8TkcrmSpxFAK 0BX3iaXISagkyzppGQ0Xeq9s3oGRdMG7hW3zhKLm3svKkIf5wI8QsePJTlFNl+8EZgtIgH 1WF8COI39/5aEYTQ/9dYu6ebjemQmNTn2OZvjGas+sGqv90ohLt7clFyZpeEyQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx1.freebsd.org; none ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=freebsd.org; s=dkim; t=1712664908; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=XBHW85TEk2VMQIfn1kIa+z5OEx0j4Iw4SpMN3Hk6xf4=; b=EL8xzCDWQyiel2oZv772juyosplf8ZZDDgX3HtIixEcGuPPeIFaKbYzErI6Nigr3XMynas 4im9Se1FUUMTwtnIVr0bDqgmv0aDHVCUmrgEb8FGDmjb5BUIxWHHlCt3iLrWhoiTjwE/+Q c7mXna30lpvNf2tbHcwgJCD3sh8ELiZhbG5tP0FA93+xeaG1hMcUPav1ULRuFUt9xN3YZr kh1wOeBj6ZwhWdOLyTgOlWWXajrOuvXObLKyks6BQZRm9p7RGwrD7KRtPKzB0ikOF7k21q OAIJm+6t3QLYcc+GT4PCr8Heje7JEDOz1k75EkjYxAtInBdFeSVdgEsTQxESjw== Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4VDPzc54J9ztvQ for ; Tue, 9 Apr 2024 12:15:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 439CF8uA012646 for ; Tue, 9 Apr 2024 12:15:08 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 439CF85E012643 for bugs@FreeBSD.org; Tue, 9 Apr 2024 12:15:08 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 277992] mpr and possible trim issues Date: Tue, 09 Apr 2024 12:15:08 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: 14.0-STABLE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Some People X-Bugzilla-Who: mike@sentex.net X-Bugzilla-Status: New X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: bugs@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated List-Id: Bug reports List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-bugs List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: freebsd-bugs+owner@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D277992 --- Comment #7 from mike@sentex.net --- I let the job continue over night and it continues to get slower on writes.= i.e after doing a trim -f /dev/da[disk in pool]/p1 one by one, the tests start = out fast (~ 300MB of files in the zfs dataset) for 4 iterations.=20 # zfs get used,referenced,compressratio quirk-test/bull1 NAME PROPERTY VALUE SOURCE quirk-test/bull1 used 371G - quirk-test/bull1 referenced 369G - quirk-test/bull1 compressratio 3.86x - disks are 1TB each Apr 8 15:00:59 r-14mfitest LOOP[30713]: ending job ran 1272 seconds (0:21:= 12) Apr 8 15:28:54 r-14mfitest LOOP[42451]: ending job ran 1285 seconds (0:21:= 25) Apr 8 15:53:22 r-14mfitest LOOP[52716]: ending job ran 1287 seconds (0:21:= 27) Apr 8 16:18:03 r-14mfitest LOOP[63083]: ending job ran 1300 seconds (0:21:= 40) Apr 8 16:55:39 r-14mfitest LOOP[78807]: ending job ran 2075 seconds (0:34:= 35) Apr 8 17:56:56 r-14mfitest LOOP[4539]: ending job ran 3496 seconds (0:58:1= 6) Apr 8 19:09:44 r-14mfitest LOOP[35043]: ending job ran 4187 seconds (1:9:4= 7) Apr 8 20:27:37 r-14mfitest LOOP[67633]: ending job ran 4493 seconds (1:14:= 53) Apr 8 21:47:30 r-14mfitest LOOP[1103]: ending job ran 4613 seconds (1:16:5= 3) Apr 8 23:11:06 r-14mfitest LOOP[36135]: ending job ran 4836 seconds (1:20:= 36) Apr 9 00:51:15 r-14mfitest LOOP[78070]: ending job ran 5829 seconds (1:37:= 9) Apr 9 02:46:06 r-14mfitest LOOP[26187]: ending job ran 6710 seconds (1:51:= 50) Apr 9 04:57:16 r-14mfitest LOOP[81635]: ending job ran 7690 seconds (2:8:1= 0)** *** daily runs at 3am so will slow that one down This morning, I rebooted the box so trim values are the same. I then forced= 6 TRIMs on the pool (zpool trim -w quirk-test) and it sort of seems to make a difference ? But not the same as doing a full trim -f Apr 9 08:02:32 r-14mfitest LOOP[53380]: ending job ran 4802 seconds (1:20:= 2) so instead of a 2hr run it took 1:20m --- Comment #8 from mike@sentex.net --- I let the job continue over night and it continues to get slower on writes.= i.e after doing a trim -f /dev/da[disk in pool]/p1 one by one, the tests start = out fast (~ 300MB of files in the zfs dataset) for 4 iterations.=20 # zfs get used,referenced,compressratio quirk-test/bull1 NAME PROPERTY VALUE SOURCE quirk-test/bull1 used 371G - quirk-test/bull1 referenced 369G - quirk-test/bull1 compressratio 3.86x - disks are 1TB each Apr 8 15:00:59 r-14mfitest LOOP[30713]: ending job ran 1272 seconds (0:21:= 12) Apr 8 15:28:54 r-14mfitest LOOP[42451]: ending job ran 1285 seconds (0:21:= 25) Apr 8 15:53:22 r-14mfitest LOOP[52716]: ending job ran 1287 seconds (0:21:= 27) Apr 8 16:18:03 r-14mfitest LOOP[63083]: ending job ran 1300 seconds (0:21:= 40) Apr 8 16:55:39 r-14mfitest LOOP[78807]: ending job ran 2075 seconds (0:34:= 35) Apr 8 17:56:56 r-14mfitest LOOP[4539]: ending job ran 3496 seconds (0:58:1= 6) Apr 8 19:09:44 r-14mfitest LOOP[35043]: ending job ran 4187 seconds (1:9:4= 7) Apr 8 20:27:37 r-14mfitest LOOP[67633]: ending job ran 4493 seconds (1:14:= 53) Apr 8 21:47:30 r-14mfitest LOOP[1103]: ending job ran 4613 seconds (1:16:5= 3) Apr 8 23:11:06 r-14mfitest LOOP[36135]: ending job ran 4836 seconds (1:20:= 36) Apr 9 00:51:15 r-14mfitest LOOP[78070]: ending job ran 5829 seconds (1:37:= 9) Apr 9 02:46:06 r-14mfitest LOOP[26187]: ending job ran 6710 seconds (1:51:= 50) Apr 9 04:57:16 r-14mfitest LOOP[81635]: ending job ran 7690 seconds (2:8:1= 0)** *** daily runs at 3am so will slow that one down This morning, I rebooted the box so trim values are the same. I then forced= 6 TRIMs on the pool (zpool trim -w quirk-test) and it sort of seems to make a difference ? But not the same as doing a full trim -f Apr 9 08:02:32 r-14mfitest LOOP[53380]: ending job ran 4802 seconds (1:20:= 2) so instead of a 2hr run it took 1:20m --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.=