From owner-freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 21 02:17:14 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6808916A4CE; Wed, 21 Jan 2004 02:17:14 -0800 (PST) Received: from atlas.informatik.rwth-aachen.de (atlas.Informatik.RWTH-Aachen.DE [137.226.194.2]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C9B843D49; Wed, 21 Jan 2004 02:17:11 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from stolz@i2.informatik.rwth-aachen.de) Received: from menelaos.informatik.rwth-aachen.de (menelaos.Informatik.RWTH-Aachen.DE [137.226.194.73]) 8.11.1-0.5-michaelw-20030918) with ESMTP id i0LAH8m16934; Wed, 21 Jan 2004 11:17:08 +0100 Received: (from stolz@localhost)i0LAH8me016961; Wed, 21 Jan 2004 11:17:08 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from stolz) Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2004 11:17:08 +0100 From: Volker Stolz To: FreeBSD-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Message-ID: <20040121101708.GA16862@i2.informatik.rwth-aachen.de> References: <200401211002.i0LA2uhZ016841@menelaos.informatik.rwth-aachen.de> <200401211010.i0LAAHiv068190@freefall.freebsd.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200401211010.i0LAAHiv068190@freefall.freebsd.org> X-PGP-Key: finger vs@foldr.org X-PGP-Id: 0x3FD1B6B5 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i cc: mab@red-bean.com Subject: Re: ports/61670: [update] comm/garmin-utils 2.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Ports bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2004 10:17:14 -0000 > >Synopsis: [update] comm/garmin-utils 2.0 For completeness: The comment for the Makefile.inc-patch should read "...appropriate for all CFLAGS", because if you have -W in make.conf, the -Werror will be triggered. The committer might want to consider not adding the Makefile-patch if it's just necessary for 'obscure' CFLAGS. OTOH, I think the patch should go in because it took me quite some time to find out why it wouldn't build -- including a stint into the C99-standard w.r.t. struct-initialization. Interesting to note that you only have such insights *after* pressing 's' to submit the PR... Volker -- http://www-i2.informatik.rwth-aachen.de/stolz/ *** PGP *** S/MIME rage against the finite state machine