From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Apr 26 22:02:55 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 63DB216A4CE for ; Tue, 26 Apr 2005 22:02:55 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail25.sea5.speakeasy.net (mail25.sea5.speakeasy.net [69.17.117.27]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D79A43D4C for ; Tue, 26 Apr 2005 22:02:55 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jhb@FreeBSD.org) Received: (qmail 20451 invoked from network); 26 Apr 2005 22:02:54 -0000 Received: from server.baldwin.cx ([216.27.160.63]) (envelope-sender )AES256-SHA encrypted SMTP for ; 26 Apr 2005 22:02:54 -0000 Received: from roboboy.corp.weather.com (gw1.twc.weather.com [216.133.140.1]) (authenticated bits=0) by server.baldwin.cx (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id j3QM2lHM035631; Tue, 26 Apr 2005 18:02:47 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from jhb@FreeBSD.org) From: John Baldwin To: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org Date: Tue, 26 Apr 2005 17:37:33 -0400 User-Agent: KMail/1.8 References: In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200504261737.34725.jhb@FreeBSD.org> X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.8 required=4.2 tests=ALL_TRUSTED, USER_IN_WHITELIST autolearn=failed version=3.0.2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.2 (2004-11-16) on server.baldwin.cx cc: Daniel Eriksson cc: 'Kris Kennaway' Subject: Re: task queue: supervisor write, page not present X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Apr 2005 22:02:55 -0000 On Saturday 16 April 2005 06:11 pm, Daniel Eriksson wrote: > Kris Kennaway wrote: > > Actually r/w nullfs used to work in 5.x and 6.x (and r/o still does), > > so if someone is seeing otherwise they need to report it. > > I've been using r/w nullfs mounts for the last 9+ months and haven't > noticed any problems before, so they probably still work just fine. The > only reason I asked the question was that one of the crashes I had happened > while I was copying files to a nullfs mount (and the video server > constantly reads from one or more nullfs mounts). > > /Daniel Eriksson Did Sam's recent fixes to taskqueues fix this panic for you? -- John Baldwin <>< http://www.FreeBSD.org/~jhb/ "Power Users Use the Power to Serve" = http://www.FreeBSD.org