From owner-freebsd-sparc64@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Apr 26 13:41:57 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E1FDDE9 for ; Fri, 26 Apr 2013 13:41:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lidl@hydra.pix.net) Received: from hydra.pix.net (hydra.pix.net [IPv6:2001:470:e254::3c]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 787301A7A for ; Fri, 26 Apr 2013 13:41:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: from hydra.pix.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by hydra.pix.net (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id r3QDfuME071610; Fri, 26 Apr 2013 09:41:56 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from lidl@hydra.pix.net) X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.97.7 at mail.pix.net Received: (from lidl@localhost) by hydra.pix.net (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) id r3QDfuib071609; Fri, 26 Apr 2013 09:41:56 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from lidl) Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2013 09:41:56 -0400 From: Kurt Lidl To: Riccardo Veraldi Subject: Re: upgrading from 8.2 to 9.1 using cvsup Message-ID: <20130426134156.GA71564@pix.net> References: <517A2B4D.3030705@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <517A2B4D.3030705@gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Cc: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the Sparc List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2013 13:41:57 -0000 On Fri, Apr 26, 2013 at 09:22:53AM +0200, Riccardo Veraldi wrote: > Hello on my blade 1000 I upgaded form sources but I got the source code > from cvsup > > I realized only after rebuilding hte world and isntallign everything > that cvsup is not anymore supported. > > my question is, do I have the latest patches or I need to get the source > tree with svnup and rebuild everything again ? Well, the uname output says '9.1-RELEASE-p2', which means you probably have the latest security patches only. If you mean to track 9.1-RELEASE, yes, you are probably up to date. If you mean to track stable/9, no, you are not up to date. Given that for the forseeable future, SVN is what the FreeBSD project is going to use, it's probably worthwhile to just compile up svn, and then checkout the source tree you wish to follow, and you'll be future-proofing your installation. -Kurt > here is what uname says > > root@blade:/root # uname -a > FreeBSD blade.cnaf.infn.it 9.1-RELEASE-p2 FreeBSD 9.1-RELEASE-p2 #0: Wed > Apr 24 15:40:56 CEST 2013 > root@blade.cnaf.infn.it:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC sparc64 > > thanknyou > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-sparc64 > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-sparc64-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"