From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 25 16:28:23 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 43B6D16A4CE for ; Tue, 25 Nov 2003 16:28:23 -0800 (PST) Received: from kientzle.com (h-66-166-149-50.SNVACAID.covad.net [66.166.149.50]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 85D0543FB1 for ; Tue, 25 Nov 2003 16:28:19 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from kientzle@acm.org) Received: from acm.org ([66.166.149.54]) by kientzle.com (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id hAQ0S9kX053643; Tue, 25 Nov 2003 16:28:09 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from kientzle@acm.org) Message-ID: <3FC3F398.2030306@acm.org> Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2003 16:28:08 -0800 From: Tim Kientzle User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20031006 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Tony Finch , current@freebsd.org References: <62981.24.0.61.35.1069202574.squirrel@mail.yazzy.org> <200311190103.hAJ13Nlg000923@dyson.jdyson.com> <20031119015433.GN30485@roark.gnf.org> <3FBC2053.6040208@mindspring.com> <20031120022009.GB29530@dan.emsphone.com> <3FBC29EF.3030009@mindspring.com> <3FBC50DB.3000002@acm.org> <20031123225117.GA24696@dragon.nuxi.com> <3FC14245.6030509@mindspring.com> <3FC14245.6030509@mindspring.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: Unfortunate dynamic linking for everything X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: kientzle@acm.org List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2003 00:28:23 -0000 Tony Finch wrote: > "Matthew D. Fuller" wrote: > >>Not just the startup scripts, but ANY script. I dare say there's a long, >>long list of scripts that use ~-expansion, to say nothing of the >>homegrown ones we all have working quietly and forgotten for years. > > > It's required for POSIX compliance. > > Tony. Ouch! Very good point, Tony. Does POSIX require that such expansion work for usernames that may not be in the current passwd file? That could dictate a lot. Tim Kientzle